Search for: "Bare v. Bare" Results 2061 - 2080 of 5,021
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2016, 12:49 pm by Giles Peaker
After a lengthy trek through Bubb, Puhlhofer, Cocks v Thanet District Council [1983] 2 AC 286, Ferdous Begum and R v Northavon District Council ex parte Palmer (1994) 26 HLR 572, the court concluded that Wednesbury was the appropriate test and further that “the range of rational decisions” was not so narrow as to determine the outcome. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 1:37 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Assistance to the children, representing the 'bare essentials of life', Rothstein v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 1:37 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Assistance to the children, representing the 'bare essentials of life', Rothstein v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 3:27 am by Peter Mahler
The resulting travails of two generations of the Lewis family are laid bare in a recent decision by Albany Commercial Division Justice Richard M. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 3:58 am by Broc Romanek
The board must exercise its own business judgment in approving an executive compensation transaction.‖ Haywood v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
This article critically reviews the Supreme Court of Canada’s recent decision on the application of human rights laws to law firm partners in McCormick v Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP in an effort to show how the purposive approach is invoked, how it is then either ignored or applied incorrectly, and how the purposive approach ought to have been deployed if we had remained faithful to its structure and demands. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:32 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A New York Family Lawyer said the petitioner filed the instant petition seeking an order of child support against the respondent. [read post]