Search for: "Battle v. State" Results 2061 - 2080 of 8,255
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Federalist Society Review, Richard Raile argues that last term’s decision in partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 7:29 am by Steve Hall
  The Supreme Court revisited the subject in 2007 in the Texas case of Scott Panetti; more on Panetti v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 11:50 am by David Markus
district court judge.The Georgia Court of Appeals judge has come under fierce criticism from progressive advocates for a swath of votes from 2000 to 2004 as a Georgia state legislator against abortion rights, same-sex marriage and to retain the state's old flag which contained the Confederate battle flag. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 12:18 pm
Where Congress uses a common-law term in statute, then the Court must assume that the term "comes with a common law meaning" (Safeco Ins Co of America v Burr )(2007)). [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:23 am
Do Italians really got what sharing services among EU Member States is about, she wonders? [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As the Supreme Court stated in the 1868 case of Texas v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:45 pm by seo
In that regard, on June 12, 2012, the United States Supreme Court ruled in United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:45 pm by seo
In that regard, on June 12, 2012, the United States Supreme Court ruled in United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 7:56 pm by David Super
  Nothing in Article V grants Congress that power, and it is difficult to see Congress doing so when roughly forty states would have less influence under such a system than under one-state-one vote. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 9:58 pm
In 1992, the Supreme Court of the United States heard a case called Quill v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:47 am by Reference Staff
The legal opinion would become popularly known as The Boldt Decision.The actual title of the case is United States v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 9:22 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
: The First Amendment battle against the Washington “Redskins” Trademark after Matal v. [read post]