Search for: "COOPER v. STATE"
Results 2061 - 2080
of 7,360
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
M.B. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2007, 4:24 pm
State v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 12:12 am
He added that his abduction and rendition to France were also planned by the CIA and were not the result of a judicial cooperation between States. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
Cooper v. [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 8:18 pm
Affirming in United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:52 am
Since Daimler AG v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 4:31 pm
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 8:04 am
Officer’s promise of non-arrest in exchange for cooperation may be enforceable; remanded for factual findings U.S. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 5:52 am
“Vacating the dismissal order is consistent with the public policy of this State to dispose of cases on their merits (Harwood v Chaliha, 291 AD2d 234, 234 [1st Dept 2002]), and upholds the principle that a trial court’s power to dismiss an action sua sponte should be used ‘sparingly and only in extraordinary circumstances'” (Cooper v Broems, 214 AD3d 497, 497 [1st Dept 2023] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Ray v… [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:53 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 5:45 pm
(See Smith v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 6:51 am
The Case of the Juror Who Punches Himself During Deliberations In State of Washington v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 11:55 pm
State Lottery Comm'n, 300 F.3d 92, 103 (1st Cir.2002). [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 1:17 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 2:31 pm
Hunnahs, LLC et al.: Benign cooperation does not establish joint liability. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 4:35 pm
His dissent ten years later in United States v. [read post]
Will the Real Evidence-Based Ebola Policy Please Stand Up? Seven Takeaways From Maine DHHS v. Hickox
6 Nov 2014, 8:44 am
The case I mentioned in my last post, Maine Department of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 10:55 am
Misuse of powers since recourse was had to enhanced cooperation although the purpose is not to achieve integration of all the Member States - the mechanism having been used instead to avoid negotiating with a Member State, imposing upon it an opt-out solution - and although the objectives pursued in this instance could have been achieved by means of a special agreement as provided for in Article 142 of the European Patent Convention. [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 3:46 pm
Duncan v. [read post]
