Search for: "California v. Force"
Results 2061 - 2080
of 6,450
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2015, 10:13 am
On June 23, 2015, the Ninth Circuit in Cabral v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 10:39 am
See Fields v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 1:52 pm
By Linda Friedman Ramirez[1] On February 28, 2020, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decided Innovation Lab v Wolf and affirmed a preliminary injunction against the Department of Homeland Security in its controversial Migrant Protection Protocols.[2] The injunction had been issued by the District Court for the Northern District of California on April 8, 2019. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 1:52 pm
By Linda Friedman Ramirez[1] On February 28, 2020, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decided Innovation Lab v Wolf and affirmed a preliminary injunction against the Department of Homeland Security in its controversial Migrant Protection Protocols.[2] The injunction had been issued by the District Court for the Northern District of California on April 8, 2019. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 10:52 am
In Kelton v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 9:33 am
In Abood v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 11:43 am
In Redevelopment Agency of Pomona v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 11:16 pm
The California Supreme Court adopted the Home Savings rule in Green v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 3:00 am
” The mandatory dues narrowly escaped a legal challenge last year in California v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Gravelet-Blondin 13-691Issue: (1) Whether it is – or should be – clearly established that police officers per se violate the United States Constitution when they use nontrivial force in the context of passive resistance, regardless of the surrounding circumstances; and (2) whether the Ninth Circuit’s unique treatment of tasers – “intermediate force as a matter of law,” which “must” be justified by the government interest… [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 1:37 pm
ShareThis Keyword search:class action, judgment, starbucks, tip sharing Related posts • Dukes v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 12:15 am
Force v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 6:00 am
In February 2009, the Northern District of California held in Sierra Club v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 6:25 am
” Lawyers v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 2:18 am
The Supreme Court of the United States held in Feres v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 8:52 am
The problem goes back nine years to Johnson v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 9:24 am
Boumediene v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 6:46 am
INS, 213 F.3d 1179, 1186 (9th Cir.2000) (affirming use of telephonic testimony for hearing in California where witness was in Missouri); Scott Timber, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:33 am
Brand West Dairy and Maria Angelica Aguirre v. [read post]
