Search for: "Companies A, B, and C" Results 2061 - 2080 of 12,894
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2015, 12:22 am by Herb Lin
  Approach (c) is the approach favored by law enforcement authorities. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 5:37 am
Republic Western Insurance Company (“Republic”) reinsured certain workers’ compensation policies issued by Reliance Insurance Company. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
The reps and warranties are already being written: “Company has not engaged in general solicitation and is not otherwise subject to Rule 506(c) . . . . [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
The reps and warranties are already being written: “Company has not engaged in general solicitation and is not otherwise subject to Rule 506(c) . . . . [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The contracts between the Litigation Lenders and Plaintiff are attached as Exhibit B, and aforementioned letter is attached as Exhibit C. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 5:48 am by Eugene Volokh
Moreover, interpreting OCGA § 10-1-451 (b) expansively to prohibit the use of PruittHealth’s marks to identify its facilities and services in any way, as the company urges, would raise profound First Amendment issues. [read post]
30 May 2014, 10:28 am
He also ordered special costs against the lawyers, including $41,000 paid to the computer analyst and a supervising solicitor who oversaw the search warrant.Jivraj and Pierce have a litigation history involving a mining company dispute. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 3:35 pm by Joseph Barton and Keeley A. McCarty
In the corporate realm since 2016, the DOJ has: a) reached criminal resolutions in 17 corporate cases; b) obtained 2 voluntary disclosures under the pilot program that led to the revised Policy; c) secured guilty pleas, deferred prosecution agreements, or a combination of both in 12 of the remaining 15 corporate resolutions; d) declined to prosecute 7 companies who voluntarily disclosed (but still required disgorgement); and e) assessed $1.6 billion in penalties and… [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 6:28 am by Seth Davis
Therefore, APHIS argues that Congress only limited the location for the surcharge funds after 2002 and not the agency’s authority to collect them, and that we must defer to its interpretation of the FACT Act so long as it is reasonable.APHIS contends that the authority to continue collecting a reserve fee after 2002 exists in subparagraphs (a)(1)(A)-(B) and that (a)(1)(C) is of no consequence now that fiscal year 2002 has come and gone. [read post]