Search for: "Doe v. Doe" Results 2061 - 2080 of 152,655
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2009, 6:19 pm
A recent Federal Circuit case highlights the contrast between claims of patent infringement and violation of the Lanham Act.In Baden Sports, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 2:10 pm
Earlier, in Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF) v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 11:05 am by marcorandazza
For any of you who have followed the case affectionately dubbed “Rakofsky v. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 9:12 pm
As to "Chevron deference," there is a citation to Merck v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 10:43 am by scanner1
., D/B/A URGENT CARE PLUS, in behalf of itself and all those similarly situated, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 2:36 pm by scanner1
CIVIL – DECLARATORY JUDGMENT DA 15-0429, 2016 MT 91, EMPLOYERS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:08 am by scanner1
MOUNTAIN WEST BANK, N.A., and John Does 1 through 10, Defendants and Appellees. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 1:12 pm
No, says the Indiana Court of Appeals in Garcia-Torres v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 6:58 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Accordingly, the use of a well-trained narcotics-detection dog—one that "does not expose noncontraband items that otherwise would remain hidden from public view," Place, 462 U.S., at 707, 103 S.Ct. 2637—during a lawful traffic stop, generally does not implicate legitimate privacy... [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 7:51 am by Matt Osenga
This afternoon, the 11 active judges of the Federal Circuit will hear argument in Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 5:50 am
Reading Miranda warnings does not turn a consensual stop into a seizure. [read post]