Search for: "Does, A-H"
Results 2061 - 2080
of 16,616
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2022, 9:29 am
by Neil H. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 9:01 pm
Even if the Fed does not move its target up that high, having a two percent or four percent target necessarily means that those whose pay does not match the inflation rate will lose buying power. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 4:31 pm
See, 42 USC § 1395nn(h)(6). [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 2:09 pm
With high operating costs, it does not take long before a large amount of gross income is reduced to a small amount of net income. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 9:55 am
According to the CEO, Edward H. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 8:57 am
(d) How would (or how does) your organization provide greenhouse gas emission data for proposals and/or contract performance? [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 3:28 am
Examining Attorney William H. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 5:32 am
Nature, he explained, does not distinguish between good persons and bad ones. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 9:01 pm
[Note to readers: In my January 20 Verdict column, I related information from an American émigré in Canada who described the process of becoming a Canadian citizen as “easy. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:03 pm
The O-1A visa is a very common alternative to the H-1B work visa. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 10:32 am
H-2 does not serialize, saving it millions of dollars and allowing it to offer lower prices than Method or other prescription-only competitors. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 11:50 am
Otherwise, Locatefamily.com must pay 20,000 euros for every 2 weeks it does not have such a representative, with a maximum of 120,000 euros. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 8:03 am
Hamburger may be correct that rules promulgated under Section 8 were binding on federal officials and not directly on the public; my article does not say otherwise. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 4:48 am
From Tribe's op-ed: While the vice president has the power to cast a tiebreaking vote to pass a bill, the Constitution does not give him the power to break ties when it comes to the Senate's "Advice and Consent" role in approving presidential appointments to the Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 12:16 pm
§ 1605(a)(2) does not apply to the established facts of this case. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 5:15 am
The information provided is my own and does not reflect the opinion of my firm or anyone else. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 6:24 pm
As this was only one of the deficiencies the court found in the NLRA's explanation, it may not have been determinative, but it does seem to represent an erroneous and unduly strict application of Fox, one more in line with Justice Breyer's dissent than Justice Scalia's opinion for the Court. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 2:28 pm
Bradley WendelEdwin H. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 12:44 pm
And at “The Volokh Conspiracy,” Jonathan H. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 12:08 pm
by Neil H. [read post]
