Search for: "Does 1 to 10" Results 2061 - 2080 of 43,709
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2024, 10:12 am by Jack Bogdanski
UPDATE, 1:40 p.m.: Denver and Minnesota win in the early games. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 1:51 pm
The elements of this cause of action are 1) Plaintiff has a business relationship, not necessarily evidenced by an enforceable contract; 2) Defendant's knowledge of the relationship; 3) Defendant's intentional and unjustifiably interfered with the relationship; and 4) Plaintiff suffered damages .Tortious interference with a contract is virtually identical to the elements of a claim for tortious interference with a business relationship. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:36 am
The result (at para 198) is this:"We have ... come to the conclusion that the appeal must be allowed and the case remitted to the High Court for retrial of the claims for infringement under Article 5(1)(a) of the Directive (as implemented in section 10(1) of the Trade Marks Act 1994) and Article 9(1)(a) of the Regulation".The court also had some harsh words for the doctrine of initial interest confusion, describing it as "unnecessary" and… [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
Question #10 – Premium Processing If my employer does Premium Processing for my H-1B extension, how long does it take for my case to get approved? [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 5:00 am
Question #10 – Premium Processing If my employer does Premium Processing for my H-1B extension, how long does it take for my case to get approved? [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 6:00 am
Answer #1 According to the USCIS, there is no grace period. [read post]
13 Aug 2023, 9:00 am by ricelawmd_3p2zve
Courts have variously put caps at a 10:1 ratio compared to the other damages in the case, but a 2018 case did uphold a 20:1 ratio, recognizing that lighter conduct might not qualify for such a high ratio. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Citywide Panel denied Plaintiff's administrative appeal challenging the denial of his application for a religious exemption from the vaccination requirement, finding that:[1] "Plaintiff failed to establish that his objection to receiving any of the COVID-19 vaccines was based on a sincerely held religious belief; and [2] "granting the accommodation would impose an undue hardship on DOE. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Citywide Panel denied Plaintiff's administrative appeal challenging the denial of his application for a religious exemption from the vaccination requirement, finding that:[1] "Plaintiff failed to establish that his objection to receiving any of the COVID-19 vaccines was based on a sincerely held religious belief; and [2] "granting the accommodation would impose an undue hardship on DOE. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 11:09 am
The second issue is whether it is allowable to amend the basic patent after grant to satisfy Article 3(a) (see questions 1 and 4). [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In vain:*** Translation of the German original ***[1.1] The [opponent] contests that Siemens AG is entitled to file an appeal.[1.2] As a consequence of the entry of the merger into the register of the seat of the receiving legal entity (übernehmender Rechtsträger) – in the present case, Siemens AG having its seat in Munich – the Flender AG does not exist any more as a legal person and its assets including the patent rights have been transferred to Siemens AG (§… [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 12:01 pm by oliver randl
The main request therefore does not meet the requirements of A 123(2) and has to be refused. [read post]