Search for: "Evans, Appeal of" Results 2061 - 2080 of 2,312
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2013, 3:55 pm by royblack
Leibowitz appealed to the U.S. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 4:58 pm by INFORRM
As the Court of Appeal has previously emphasised, judges are tasked with meticulously weighing the competing public interest factors at play on the particular circumstances before them. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 5:21 am by Rob Robinson
Developer for Wiping Evidence - http://tinyurl.com/49u3kmc (Katheryn Hayes Tucker) Social Media and Intellectual Property Risks – http://tinyurl.com/4qk5fug (Pria Chetty) Social Networking Compliance: A Guide for IT Teams – http://tinyurl.com/4cfny3q (Paul Kozenlowski) Texas Court of Appeals is Soft on Hard Drives – http://tinyurl.com/67exvpy (Mallory Griffin) The California Bar Weighs in on Legal Ethics in the Cloud – http://bit.ly/dLEAWh (Robert Ambrogi) Throwing… [read post]
8 May 2007, 1:24 am
Trial Lawyer Is Denied Fee After Appellate Settlement New York Law Journal A New York federal judge has ruled against a lawyer seeking to collect a contingent fee on a case he lost at the trial level but which his client settled after filing an appeal. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 7:00 am by Adam White
There is some instinctual appeal to this argument, but it fades when one considers the practicalities of principal-agent relationships. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:53 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Prior to that, he spent ten years as a partner at Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, PLLC, where he principally represented corporate clients. [read post]
16 May 2016, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Charged with drug offenses, respondent unsuccessfully moved to suppress the evidence found incident to his arrest, after which he offered a conditional guilty plea to the drug charges, reserving the right to appeal the denial of suppression.Causal LinkWhen the Supreme Court considers whether evidence must be suppressed as fruit of an unreasonable search or seizure under the Fourth Amendment, it generally considers what the causal link is between the illegal police conduct and the evidence… [read post]
18 May 2023, 3:28 am by Seán Binder
Jamie Gangel, Zachary Cohen, Evan Perez, and Paula Reid report for CNN. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
In late July, the Court of Arbitration for Sport (“the court”), the final appeals court for global sports, suspended the practice of “hyperandrogenism regulation” by the International Association of Athletics Federations (“the I.A.A.F. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 5:14 am by David G. Badertscher
A unanimous New York appeals court panel disagreed last week and rejected his appeal.Former N.Y. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:50 pm by Dennis Crouch
Clarity of Record Pilot Robin Evans, Director of TC 2800, focused on the clarity of the record pilot, which started in March and will run for 6 months. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 1:57 pm by Thomas Merrill
  The primary purpose of the language, as the court of appeals held, is to make clear that Louisiana is entitled to get at least 3,000 cubic feet per second at the Arkansas-Louisiana border. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am by Andrew Hamm
For the Yale Journal on Regulation’s Notice & Comment blog, Evan Bernick reviews Barrett’s “extensive scholarship on statutory interpretation” for “insight into how Barrett might approach one of administrative law’s most centrally important and controversial doctrines: Chevron deference, which requires judges to defer to ‘reasonable’ agency interpretations of ‘ambiguous’ statutory text. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 11:29 am by Andrew Hamm
In the wake of the announcement by the Boy Scouts of America that the organization would no longer prohibit openly gay adults from serving as troop leaders, Marcia Coyle interviews Evan Wolfson, who represented James Dale in his unsuccessful challenge to the ban fifteen years ago, for the Supreme Court Brief (subscription required). [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
At AP, Jeff Amy and Mark Sherman report that “[t]he state, defending the conviction, argues that [the] justices must narrow the focus from [District Attorney Doug] Evans’ broader record to the case at hand. [read post]