Search for: "GRAVES v. STATE" Results 2061 - 2080 of 2,427
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2018, 2:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
The underinclusivity of this law gravely diminishes the credibility of the Government's rationale [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  To take one example, at the time that the Court decided the leading qualified immunity case of Harlow v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 3:19 pm
Case T 647/11 Asos plc v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), Roger Maier, a decision of the General Court of the European Union (Seventh Chamber) this past Tuesday, is just one piece in a rather larger jigsaw of interlocking litigation between two assertive brand owners. [read post]
22 May 2010, 10:20 am by Jeff Gamso
an op-ed Turow wrote back in 2000 shortly after the Supremes decided Dickerson v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 2:05 pm by Stephen Bilkis
At that point the Husband, by his own admission stated: "When your grandmother passes away, I will piss on her grave. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Jenny Gesley
Universal jurisdiction is one of the key principles codified in the German Code of Crimes Against International Law (CCAIL) (Völkerstrafgesetzbuch, VStGB). [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 7:15 pm
But to get the real flavor, you have to look at the en banc rulings in Grutter v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 6:53 am
Greenberg v Mallick Management, Inc., 527 N.E. 2d 943, 949 (Ill. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 8:40 pm by Kedar
Tags: Elena Kagan, Solicitor General Related posts Reflections on my First Live Oral Arguments – Ricci v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 9:00 am by Jamie Maclaren
But it was the exhibit on Brown v Board of Education of Topeka that brought my mind to present-day Canada. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 3:58 pm by Lyle Denniston
Judge Silberman’s opinion in the case of Seven-Sky v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its… [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:51 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Relies on member states; referrals go through national authorities. [read post]