Search for: "Givens Group, Inc."
Results 2061 - 2080
of 6,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2016, 8:22 am
Sandoz, those factual findings should be given deference even though the ultimate determination of definiteness is a question of law. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 4:39 pm
©2011 Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 4:19 pm
©2010 Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 11:39 am
For the fourth factor, the court quoted Castle Rock Entertainment, Inc v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 5:04 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 11:03 am
©2010 Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 10:42 am
” While making the movie, Warner/Chappell, a music publishing division of the much larger Warner Music Group, demanded a license fee of $1,500 to use the song in the documentary. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 10:42 am
” While making the movie, Warner/Chappell, a music publishing division of the much larger Warner Music Group, demanded a license fee of $1,500 to use the song in the documentary. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 7:38 pm
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. and Conestoga Wood Specialties v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
%E2%80%9D [2] Id. [3] Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 4:01 am
Callow Inc. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 6:47 am
Contact the employment attorneys at Nassiri Law Group, practicing in Orange County, Riverside and Los Angeles. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 5:39 am
Editor’s Note: Given the challenge of monitoring and tracking merger, acquisition, and investment activity for eDiscovery-related companies, from time to time the quarterly and annual reporting of the number of events may change slightly as new information becomes available concerning these events. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 10:14 pm
DTR Industries, Inc [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:29 am
On that hypothesis, it would have been difficult to defend the guidance given by the Court of Appeal in Glaxo Group Ltd v Genentech Inc [2008] Bus LR 888 to the effect that the English court should normally refuse a stay of its own proceedings if it would be likely to resolve the question of validity significantly earlier. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 8:01 am
Currently, the guidance (given in Glaxo Group Ltd v Genentech Inc [2008] Bus LR 888) is that a stay should be granted, unless it appears that "the evidence is that some commercial certainty would be achieved at a considerably earlier date in the case of the UK proceedings than in the EPO". [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:57 am
Present ownership depended upon a purported transfer under a 1992 agreement between Island Logic Limited (‘ILL’), part of the Island group of companies founded by Chris Blackwell, "the single person most responsible for turning the world on to reggae music", and Cayman Music Inc (‘CMI’). [read post]
24 May 2013, 9:00 am
We'd say crack open a cold one for us as well, but given that it's before noon on a Friday and you're probably at work, that might not be the best advice we've ever given. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 8:47 am
Such speech, of course, would be constitutionally protected in the U.S., at least since Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 9:00 am
As expected, particularly given the versatility of the different kind of design rights, in many cases more than one type of right was asserted. [read post]
