Search for: "Harris v. Day"
Results 2061 - 2080
of 2,683
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2011, 2:21 pm
The Court ordered that the application in People v Grant, No. 142378, be held in abeyance pending the decisions in People v Likine, No. 141154, People v Parks, No 141181, and People v Harris, No 141513, currently pending on appeal before the Court. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 5:09 pm
Harris v Harris (1962) 57 C2d 367. 3. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 11:33 am
It was the subject of a recent Supreme Court case, Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 7:52 am
There's an enchanting little piece about burned DVDs being given away with every purchase of a $5 jewel case here on the 1709 Blog. and if that's not exciting enough, the same blog comes with news of the obituary of Willie the Wizard v Harry Potter and a guest post on the cause celebre in the making, the prosecution of Aaron Swartz. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 3:31 am
I argued that all obligations that are due on a particular day -- whether those obligations involve paying principal or interest on U.S. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 3:36 pm
The name is Harris v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 1:06 pm
Twombly and Iqbal v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 7:45 am
In this week’s case (Seder v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 11:47 am
Supreme Court in Morrison v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:36 am
In Cornell v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 7:10 am
One particularly relevant case is Harris v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 9:37 am
As we mentioned yesterday, due to Dechert’s involvement in litigation concerning the drug at issue in Pliva, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 8:28 am
Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971), holding that because Ms. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:36 am
Among 89 clinics that accepted both types of insurance, the average wait time for Medicaid-CHIP enrollees was 22 days longer than that for privately insured children. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:13 pm
The CAFC Leapfrog ruling came days after the Supreme Court's KSR ruling. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 2:41 pm
Google) and directory services (Harris v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 10:27 am
Two days ago, in Hayes v. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 3:55 am
In the case of Clayton Harris v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 3:10 am
The IEEE has gone as far as to suggest that the recent Supreme Court decision in Stanford v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 10:12 am
Harris, 10-520, for Kurns v. [read post]
