Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: T. S."
Results 2061 - 2080
of 182,362
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2014, 8:26 am
From Slate: [T]he new Canadian bill would go further than the Swedes do by making it illegal for sex workers to advertise their services, or to communicate their interest in selling sex in a place where a child might plausibly... [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 12:26 pm
David T. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 12:19 pm
Interesting article in today's Wall Street Journal for those (like me) scarily confronting impending college bills: Applying for Financial Aid: When It Isn't Worth Your Time, by Jonathan Clements:For many high-school seniors, this week isn't just the beginning of the... [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 6:21 am
Celebrated on the internet, Tovar advises: "It’s probably not in your best interest if they have a loaded firearm, I wouldn’t suggest that to just anybody. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 7:20 am
For me, I either don’t notice them or they don’t interest me. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 3:57 am
T-Mobile, US, Inc., the Delaware Supreme Court construed one provision in a settlement agreement between Cox Communications (Cox) and T-Mobile's predecessor in interest, Sprint Corporation (Sprint). [read post]
17 Aug 2006, 6:02 am
It's impossible to market a service that you don't want to perform.... [read post]
7 May 2009, 9:05 am
Michael Dorf has an interesting post on the "inexplicable error" in Jeff Rosen's article about potential Supreme Court nominee Judge Sonia Sotomayor. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 12:40 pm
I wouldn’t bet on it, but I found it interesting that, according to this report in the NYT’s “The Caucus,” “He derided the report in Politico as being based on “anonymous sources. [read post]
30 May 2024, 4:19 am
Okay, this one's not very interesting, but can't stop, won't stop giving updates on SCOTUS arbitration decisions. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 4:30 am
Interesting development. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 9:54 am
Interesting front-page article in the Weekend Wall Street Journal: Some of MIT's Arithmetic Hasn't Been Adding Up, by Keith J. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 5:12 pm
It's subscription-only, so I haven't read the whole thing yet, but this JAMA article promises to be interesting. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 12:23 pm
Krugman's piece today, which demands not so much refutation as diagnosis, illustrates the problem, but also doesn't explain much. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 7:04 am
An interesting set of contributions, some by well-known philosophers, over at Weinberg's blog. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 2:31 pm
Arizona continues to pass interesting legislation. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm
In the Board’s view these cannot be considered as “notorious”. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 12:00 am
Arrangements under ADA were available to any interested natural or legal person and thus also applied to opponents. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 12:07 pm
I haven’t decided whether to go look myself yet — part of me doesn’t want to do their work for them and part of me is a bit afraid of what I’ll see! [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 7:09 am
There must not be ambiguity regarding the customer’s obligations given the significant legal differences between an indication of interest and a conditional offer to buy. [read post]
