Search for: "In Re IT Group, Inc., Co." Results 2061 - 2080 of 2,431
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2009, 1:16 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCivil Practice Proposed Intervenors' Interests Not Inadequately Represented by Derivative Action's Plaintiffs In re Ambac Financial Group Inc. [read post]
19 May 2009, 2:51 am
According to IBM, that is more than the number of patents of six major competitors -- Hewlett-Packard Co., Apple Inc., EMC Corp., Microsoft Corp., Google Inc., and Oracle Corp. -- combined.What else are they doing right when not leading the charge in patent applications? [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
: Omnicare, Inc v OHIM, Astellas Pharma GmbH (Class 46) CFI delivers judgment in case concerning ability of designer who assigns business and related IP to another company, to object when the company tries to register his name as a CTM: Elio Fiorucci v OHIM (IPKat) CFI: Good faith irrelevant when selling non-misleading sausages: Alberto Severi, in his own name and representing Cavazzuti e figli SpA, now known as Grandi Salumifici Italiani SpA v Regione Emilia-Romagna (IPKat) CFI clarifies… [read post]
13 May 2009, 8:00 pm
Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. and Genetics Institute, Inc., 927 F.2d 1200. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
(BLOG@IP::JUR) CAFC Judge Rader: ‘Stronger IP system allows countries to compete in world marketplace’ (PatentlyBIOtech) Professor Mossoff’s historical paper about patent thickets, patent trolls and patent pools: relevant today (IP Dragon) The balance between standards and patent regulation (IP Frontline) Patents in a bear market (IP Solutions)   Australia Full Federal Court: Commonsense approach to trade mark use and the beer/wine dichotomy confirmed:… [read post]
7 May 2009, 2:17 pm
No Promising Sign If the government can't find anyone who broke any rules at Lehman Brothers, that's not a promising sign for investigations into other corporate train wrecks, from American International Group Inc. to Freddie Mac. [read post]
7 May 2009, 2:00 pm
Preliminary figures show that several major banks, including JPMorgan Chase & Co., American Express Co., Goldman Sachs Group, Bank of New York Mellon Corp., MetLife Inc., Capital One Financial Corp. and State Street Corp. have been assessed as not needing to raise any more capital. [read post]
5 May 2009, 5:57 am
District Court, Southern District of Indiana (Indianapolis); and In re Seroquel Products Litigation, 06-MD-01769, U.S. [read post]
4 May 2009, 8:11 am
[*Climate]Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:36 am by Bill Heinze
Bravo Co., 64 USPQ2d 1597, 1603 (TTAB 2002); see also, In re Rath, 402 F.3d 1207, 74 USPQ2d 1174, 1175 (Fed. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
: In re Kubin and KSR International Co v Teleflex Inc (Patent Docs)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: USPTO, Tafas & GSK request extension for reconsideration (IP Watchdog) CAFC: Patent on sex aid is obvious: Ritchie v Vast Resources (AKA Topco) (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Assigning patent rights: Euclid Chemical v Vector Corrosion (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) District Court E D Michigan: LEDdynamics wins summary judgment in LED tube patent suit… [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
Here is why (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Innovative methods for corporate legal managers to reduce IP counsel costs (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) The malign and the benign of the transfer of know-how (IP finance) How to avoid potential conflict when inventors want their innovations back (Technology Transfer Tactics) 50% of venture capital investment is lost: How your clients can improve these odds by using the right patent analytics (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) New website, Intellogist, compares patent search… [read post]