Search for: "Kennedy Thomas" Results 2061 - 2080 of 4,886
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2014, 12:46 pm by The Federalist Society
Justice Thomas also wrote a dissenting opinion, joined by Justices Scalia, Ginsburg, and Alito. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 12:46 pm by The Federalist Society
Justice Thomas also wrote a dissenting opinion, joined by Justices Scalia, Ginsburg, and Alito. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:46 am by Wells Bennett
Justices Scalia, Thomas and Alito each wrote separately, and each concurred in the judgment. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:36 am
For instance, just consider the usual partisan 5-4 story: (1) in many areas of law, including free speech, privacy, unconstitutional conditions and Confrontation Clause cases, it is mostly useless; (2) it does little to explain when and why justices might vote against presumed type, as Roberts did in the health-care case, Roberts and Kennedy did in the Arizona immigration case, and Breyer did in the Michigan affirmative action case; (3) it papers over major differences in how broadly and… [read post]
30 May 2014, 12:45 pm by Federalist Society
Chief Justice Roberts, as well as Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Sotomayor, and Kagan joined the opinion of the Court. [read post]
30 May 2014, 12:45 pm by Federalist Society
Chief Justice Roberts, as well as Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Sotomayor, and Kagan joined the opinion of the Court. [read post]
29 May 2014, 12:43 pm by The Federalist Society
Chief Justice Roberts authored a dissenting opinion, which Justices Scalia and Thomas joined. [read post]
29 May 2014, 12:43 pm by The Federalist Society
Chief Justice Roberts authored a dissenting opinion, which Justices Scalia and Thomas joined. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am by Guest Blogger
” – but the one power he thought necessary to prevent disunion, the federal veto, was repeatedly and definitively rejected.[5]Eleven days before the Convention adjourned, Madison complained to Thomas Jefferson, in Paris at the time, that because his proposal for a federal negative of state legislation had been turned down, “the plan should it be adopted will neither effectually answer its national object nor prevent … local mischiefs. [read post]
29 May 2014, 7:00 am by Kedar Bhatia
Justice Agreement: Justices Scalia and Thomas have agreed in the judgment of cases more frequently than any other pair this Term (95.8%). [read post]
28 May 2014, 7:37 am by Markham Erickson
  Justice Kagan wrote the opinion for a non-ideological majority that included Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Kennedy, Breyer, and Sotomayor. [read post]
27 May 2014, 6:00 pm by Christine Swanick
In his dissent, Justice Thomas, joined by Justices Scalia, Ginsburg, and Alito[20], stated that deference to Congress and to precedent did not justify upholding the doctrine of tribal sovereign immunity in commercial activities conducted outside of Indian country.[21]  Describing tribal sovereign immunity as “a substantial affront” to states, Thomas argued that the doctrine had aggravated relationships between states and tribes and should be abandoned by the… [read post]
27 May 2014, 10:14 am by Lyle Denniston
Kennedy, Antonin Scalia, Sonia Sotomayor, and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
27 May 2014, 9:03 am by Lyle Denniston
Roberts, Jr., and Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
27 May 2014, 9:01 am by Amy Howe
In a five-to-four opinion by Justice Elena Kagan that was joined by the Chief Justice and Justices Kennedy, Breyer, and Sotomayor, the Court began with a survey of Court’s case law dealing with immunity for tribes. [read post]
26 May 2014, 5:35 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
 Scalia, Thomas and Alito join Ginsburg, Kagan and Sotomayor in the majority opinion, while Roberts and Kennedy join Breyer in his dissent. [read post]
Justice Kennedy’s opinion—which announced the judgment of the Court and which was joined in full by the Chief Justice and Justice Alito and in part by Justices Scalia and Thomas—was to us quite surprising and disappointing. [read post]