Search for: "LaBelle v. LaBelle"
Results 2061 - 2080
of 12,166
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2017, 1:16 am
v=pdbvOqeBkq8http://variety.com/2017/music/news/drake-sampling-lawsuit-jimmy-smith-copyright-jazz-1202449097/See also Abilene Music, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 4:28 am
UMG V. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 11:30 am
À.R.L. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 11:26 am
Cooper v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 1:56 am
The yoghurt case in question is Fage UK Ltd & Another v Chobani UK Ltd & Another [the decision of Briggs J at trial is at [2013] EWHC 630 (Ch), noted by the IPKat here; the appeal decision, at [2014] EWCA Civ 5, featuring Lords Justices Lewison, Kitchin and Longmore, is noted by the IPKat here]. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 5:04 pm
Altman, of Manhattan.Keywords: lawyer digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music movies indie independent label freeculture creative commons pop/rock artists riaa independent mp3 cd favorite songs intellectual property portable music player var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true}; [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 10:18 am
The much anticipated preemption case, Wyeth v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 2:40 pm
The pro se Maryland case, UMG Recordings v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 4:38 pm
In Atlantic Recording v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 9:38 am
The labels/fact-checks aren’t disparaging CHD’s goods/services or promoting anyone else’s goods/services, so they are not covered by the Lanham Act. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 8:43 pm
In Nollan v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 8:43 pm
In Nollan v. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 6:11 am
Yongdae Kim in Capitol Records v. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 7:13 am
Orgain, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 2:53 pm
John King and Tammy Drummond, et. al. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 5:23 am
In the 2020 decision for National Association of Wheat Growers et al. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 7:32 am
Stewart v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 2:29 pm
The case is Tavilla v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:35 am
Ogden v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 11:29 am
In this case, the CJEU accepted that LABELL has no meaning and BLACK LABEL BY EQUIVALENZA (partially?) [read post]
