Search for: "Land v. United States" Results 2061 - 2080 of 6,678
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
On March 22, 2017, we blogged about the importance of the United States Supreme Court’s looming decision in Murr v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 9:50 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
(Bankruptcy; Tribal Sovereign Immunity)United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 7:52 pm by Conor McEvily
petition of the day is: Title: First American Financial Corp. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 10:55 pm
Wall, a case arising under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 10:58 am
City of Patterson decision of March 2009, indicates that local inclusionary zoning practices are still subject to controlling state law notwithstanding efforts to characterize such regulations or exactions of housing units as "zoning" or "land use regulation. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 7:55 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Federal Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2017.htmlUnited States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:44 pm by Ilya Somin
Code Section 1441, which allows defendants to remove to federal court "any civil action brought in a State court of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 9:01 am
United States (on circuits courts’ power to enhance criminal sentences sua sponte) No. 06-7517, Irizarry v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 12:52 pm by Josh Blackman
Sobol fought the case all the way to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 1:15 pm by Theodora Simon
Since European settlers arrived on the shores of what is now known as the United States, federal and state governments, intent on seizing Indian lands, have sought to undermine and threaten the existence of tribes through the forced separation and assimilation of Native children. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 1:02 am by rhapsodyinbooks
United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case concerning the constitutionality of Executive Order 9066. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 3:07 pm by Jon Sands
  That holding, Judge Paez explained in his concurral opinion, flows from United States v. [read post]