Search for: "Lowe v. United States"
Results 2061 - 2080
of 4,753
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2014, 3:03 pm
To resolve this issue, one party must demonstrate they used the mark in commerce before the other party, thereby entitling that party to register the trademark at the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
23 May 2008, 10:17 am
Casey and new lows in its indifference to the evidentiary record in Stenberg v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 7:47 am
Jackson v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 3:44 am
” ODonnell v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 1:54 am
In late July the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued a "final" (but not final-final) Office action rejecting all claims of the '915 patent. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 7:20 am
This list was assembled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 9:22 am
Arguments of the United States Assistant to the Solicitor General Benjamin Snyder argued for the United States in support of neither party. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 10:36 am
On August 29, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Vasquez v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 4:03 am
’s Chapter 7 powers to maintain international peace and security and the proper exercise of an organ’s functions (United Nations, Charter of the United Nations, 1945, 1 UNTS XVI). [read post]
14 Oct 2017, 8:56 am
Headache and low-grade fever may also accompany this illness. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:30 pm
The decision interpreted the first-sale doctrine, which allows legal owners to resell, lend, or dispose of copyrighted works after purchase, to apply only to works manufactured in the United States. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:30 pm
The decision interpreted the first-sale doctrine, which allows legal owners to resell, lend, or dispose of copyrighted works after purchase, to apply only to works manufactured in the United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 1:20 am
Per Masters v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:05 am
That fee is set by a schedule based on the floor area of the units built. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 4:41 am
, 718 P.2d 88 (U.S.Court of Appeals for the 3d Circuit 1983).Once this low threshold is met, the evidence is admissible unless provided otherwise in `the United States Constitution, a federal statute, [the Federal Rules of Evidence], or other rules prescribed by the Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 8:23 am
State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 10:00 am
For reasons that confound, the employer decided it was a good idea to challenge the removal petition - the case originated in State court - on the grounds that removal jurisdiction violated Article I, § 10 of the United States Constitution - the so-called impairment-of-contracts clause. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 6:19 am
How can it, when your expectations are already so (justifiably) low? [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 5:20 am
United States, 529 U.S. 848, 857 (2000) (internal citation omitted); see also NFIB, 567 U.S. at 562 (Opinion of Roberts, C.J.). [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 11:38 am
One important Kennedy opinion pointing in the other direction was United States v. [read post]
