Search for: "MATTER OF C A" Results 2061 - 2080 of 36,759
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2023, 7:59 am by Alex Phipps
After review, the court found no error with the lack of a competency hearing, dismissed the ineffective assistance of counsel argument without prejudice, and remanded the matter to the trial court for review of whether defendant validly waived indictment. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 7:21 am by Adrian Santiago
(c) This section shall become operative on January 1, 2017. 16001. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Dist. of the City of New York, 2022 WL 797971 [Sup Ct, New York County 2022, Kotler, J.]; Matter of Bryan v The Bd. of Educ. of the City Sch. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Dist. of the City of New York, 2022 WL 797971 [Sup Ct, New York County 2022, Kotler, J.]; Matter of Bryan v The Bd. of Educ. of the City Sch. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 11:14 pm by Thalia Kruger
Romania (para 49), which reads as follows: ‘In matters pertaining to the reunification of children with their parents, the adequacy of a measure is also to be judged by the swiftness of its implementation. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
The Securities and Exchange Commission regulations on climate disclosure, first proposed in March 2022 and likely to be issued in final form in October 2023,[1] have drawn considerable controversy and face an uncertain fate in the inevitable litigation.[2] Much less attention has gone to two bills that are moving toward adoption in California. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 12:39 pm by Brian Albrecht
  On the one hand, in theory, no matter how much people say it, monopsony is not the mirror image of monopoly. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 8:40 am by Kai Schmidt-Hern (Lubberger Lehment )
Here is a LINK to the conclusion of the judgement of 27 April 2023, C‑104/22 (see bottom of linked page). [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by Brooke MacKenzie
Awards, rankings and third party endorsements which contravene this rule include those that: (a) do not genuinely reflect the performance of the lawyer and the quality of services provided by the lawyer but appear to do so; (b) are not the result of a reasonable evaluative process; (c) are conferred in part as a result of the payment of a fee or other consideration rather than as a result of a legitimate evaluation of the performance and quality of the lawyer; or (d) the lawyer could not… [read post]
This is in line with the current version of the Guidelines G-VI.4 stating: Subject-matter described in a document can only be regarded as having been made available to the public, and therefore as comprised in the state of the art pursuant to Art. 54(1), if the information given therein is sufficient to enable the skilled person, at the relevant date of the document to practise the technical teaching which is the subject of the document, taking into account also the general knowledge at… [read post]