Search for: "Miller Legal Services"
Results 2061 - 2080
of 2,479
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2025, 12:57 pm
Primarily, this clemency signals to future actors that if their chosen candidate wins, violence or law-breaking in service of that candidate will be forgiven. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:30 am
In the 17 years following her graduation from law school, Jackson held a variety of legal jobs. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am
” (Kavanaugh also interpreted the controlling legal standard in a way that was somewhat more deferential to the Board than did Henderson.) [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:50 am
In the Courts Last week marked the beginning of the new legal term. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 8:05 am
Brad Miller discusses the issue with Secretary Albright. [read post]
31 Mar 2025, 1:58 am
The statement reported that Mr Staines had agreed to pay Mr Vince damages and legal costs, Vince v Stains KB-2024-001676 [pdf]. [read post]
28 Apr 2025, 4:57 am
Greg Miller, Jelena Ćosić, and Tamsin Lee-Smith report. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
It was the last blank space on the legal map – the only state with no precedent whatsoever. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 8:52 am
General CEQA Overview and Standard of Review While these sections of the opinion, comprising four pages, are pretty standard in their recitation of substantive legal content familiar to most CEQA practitioners, the interesting thing about them is that they cite only California Supreme Court cases – six of them to be exact, five of which have been decided since 2017. [read post]
2 Apr 2025, 9:21 am
County’s “Infill” Threshold Held Invalid Because Its Assumptions Lack Substantial Evidence Support But Not Because It Is Qualitative In Nature The Court of Appeal quickly dispensed with appellants’ legal challenge to the infill threshold, which was based on the argument that it must be quantitative, under Guidelines section 15064.3(b)(3), unless existing models or methods are unavailable to develop such a standard. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:08 pm
” It ultimately held, based on an extensive analysis of well-settled legal principles, that “the March 2016 decision was the final judgment and the December 2016 decision was a post-judgment order”; it then rejected ACCORD’s cognizable arguments on the limited issues it had validly raised on appeal. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 4:55 pm
This post focuses on the legal rules and standards announced by the Court and their potentially significant implications for lead agencies and project proponents who consider approval of changes to a development project thahttp://www.ceqadevelopments.com/2016/05/12/the-plot-thickens-california-supreme-court-vacates-submission-of-just-argued-ceqa-subsequent-review-case-orders-supplemental-briefing/t has already undergone and survived a full CEQA review. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 4:44 pm
In a 53-page published opinion filed October 8, 2021, the Fourth District Court of Appeal mostly affirmed, but reversed in part, a judgment in a CEQA action challenging two sets of projects of the City of San Diego to underground overhead utility wires in several neighborhoods. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:13 am
This would help EID meet its legally imposed water conservation mandates and would also enhance water quality by reducing contamination and erosion problems to which the open ditch was susceptible. [read post]
18 Mar 2025, 10:43 am
Relevant Legal Background: SB 52’s Tribal CulturalResources Provisions and Consultation Procedures Among other things, SB 52, enacted in 2014, provides that a project “may have a significant effect on the environment” for CEQA purposes when it has “an effect that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource[.] [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 11:59 am
Only when a private party can legally compel approval without any changes in the design of its project which might alleviate adverse environmental consequences. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 4:37 pm
” In a terse, fact-specific, and somewhat ambiguous legal analysis (mixing CEQA’s “tiering” and “modified project” rules), the Court rejected SFLN’s specific contention that the EIR relied on the Housing Element’s maximum allowable density and height requirements as the baseline for its land use and aesthetic impacts analysis. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 2:03 pm
” Accordingly, the Court stated that “under the abuse of discretion standard set forth in section 21168.5, we will independently review claims of legal error and apply the substantial evidence standard to claims that [C]ARB committed factual error. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 5:29 am
`Loss’ under the CFAA is defined broadly as `any reasonable cost to any victim, including the cost of responding to an offense, conducting a damage assessment, and restoring the data, program, system, or information to its condition prior to the offense, and any revenue lost, cost incurred, or other consequential damages incurred because of interruption of service. [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:01 pm
But even as the lawsuit seeks to attach some legal flesh onto the political bones of the dispute, the litigation also highlights two recurring problems with the debate so far: (1) the term “sanctuary” is too broad, as a legal matter, insofar as it is used as an umbrella to cover many state and local actions that are very different (legally speaking) from one another; and (2) the legal positions advanced by the federal administration and ambitious… [read post]
