Search for: "New York v. United States Department of Justice"
Results 2061 - 2080
of 2,577
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2020, 8:36 am
New York) concerning the Commerce Secretary’s inclusion of a citizenship question on the census, in which the Supreme Court held that the stated justif [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:42 am
United States, in which the Justices will consider whether purposefully flooding land is a Fifth Amendment taking. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 11:34 am
United States of America). [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 6:57 pm
Under the FISA Amendment Act of 2008, reauthorized in 2012, warrantless wiretapping was approved by federal authorities, although this is currently being challenged and fought against via the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in Clapper v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:45 pm
The The New York Times first exposed the NSA’s warrantless wiretapping of international phone calls to and from Americans in 2005. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 6:19 am
This position echoes the International Court of Justice’s (ICJ) stance in Dispute Regarding Navigational and Related Rights (Costa Rica v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
Here is IP Thinktank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 5:26 am
Even limited to the United States, the U.S. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:45 am
That is exactly the Department of Justice’s argument in its response brief: that its new rule is completely different from the prior administration’s “bar,” because according to DOJ, the new rule “does not treat manner of entry as dispositive, but instead creates a rebuttable presumption that can be overcome…”4 So the “Mother, may I? [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 1:14 am
In the Ninth Circuit appeal of the Epic Games v. [read post]
1 May 2010, 11:37 pm
" The United States Department of Justice found that 5 percent of 9,691 sex offenders released from prison were re-arrested for new sex crimes within three years, according to a 2003 report released by the Bureau of Justice Statistics. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
Perhaps we need a reminder from Chief Justice John Marshall in Marbury v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 6:34 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top Online intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
The US Department of Justice calls this “among the largest criminal copyright cases ever brought by the United States,” though I wouldn’t be surprised if it is actually the largest such case — I’m not aware of any larger criminal actions.1 No doubt the proceedings will be followed closely by many over the next few months. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 5:03 pm
And just this week, in the New York Times, law enforcement officials from New York, London, Paris, and Madrid published a similarly flawed op-ed discussing device encryption, using misleading anecdotes in an attempt to frighten the public into accepting their vision of total surveillance through undermined crypto. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 12:30 pm
United States tells us, the basis for impeachment is a political question, meaning that impeachment effectively means whatever Congress decides, and the courts will not review or challenge the determination. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 12:30 pm
United States tells us, the basis for impeachment is a political question, meaning that impeachment effectively means whatever Congress decides, and the courts will not review or challenge the determination. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 5:55 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
17 May 2011, 11:46 am
In United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 9:03 pm
It is no exaggeration to say, then, that the constitutional meaning of church-state separation is very much in flux, and it is tempting to think that the Court has taken on a case from a town in New York to reach for some new clarity. [read post]
