Search for: "Paul Smith" Results 2061 - 2080 of 2,789
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2013, 9:35 am by Ronald Mann
Thus, although Lexmark suggests the Court should import antitrust standing principles, a powerful amicus brief from Paul Smith on behalf of the American Intellectual Property Law Association (filed topside, on behalf of neither party) argues that the Court should adopt the “reasonable interest” test, originally developed by the Second Circuit and applied by the Sixth Circuit in this case. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 2:29 am
The Houston Chronicle memorably reported at the time:After watching the arguments, longtime court reporters wrote analyses comparing Rosenthal's performance unfavorably with that of his much more seasoned opponent, Paul Smith. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 7:37 am
Michael Pauling, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Graham Macdonald Smith, Assistant Attorney General.Facts: Appellant appeals his convictions on two counts of immoral or indecent acts with a minor in violation of Wyo. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 7:50 am
Smith, senior vice president of Walden Capital Asset Management, told Governance Weekly earlier. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:39 pm by Francisco Macías
Capitol Visitor Center; Melinda Smith, curator of the United States Senate; and Amy Burton, Senate curatorial assistant. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 4:31 pm
(In one of the April 25 decisions by the Supreme Court, Smith v. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 5:06 am
Paul's admonition, "wives, submit to your husbands," means that women should marry, have children, and support a man who shoulders the responsibilities of the world - not so different from what the FLDSers believe.Indeed, it's worth mentioning that the biblical case for polygamy is longstanding and well-founded. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 5:12 am by Beatrice Yahia
Joe Stanley-Smith reports for POLITICO. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 10:24 am by Dennis Crouch
Of course, the issues here have been substantially debated already with commentators coming out on both sides of the debate: Paul Morgan, The Ambiguity in Section 102(a)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Review 29. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:37 pm by Mary L. Dudziak
  Within two weeks of Pearl Harbor, Congress passed a war powers act “authorizing the President to reorganize the federal government virtually as he saw fit,” as constitutional historian Paul Murphy put it. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 2:04 am by LindaMBeale
  And those problems are exacerbated by the continuing blind faith of so many Washington politicians in the "degenerating discourse of mainstream economics" (the link is to a recent post on Yves Smith's Naked Capitalism by Philip Pilkington). [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
Booking.com, which asks whether the addition of “.com” to a generic term creates a protectable trademark, and Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 11:51 am by Tessa Shepperson
A post about defences to possession proceedings (spurious or otherwise) brought forth some interesting comments from readers, and we have an excellent guest post, Twist stick or bust from solicitor Paul Hajek. [read post]