Search for: "People v Johnson" Results 2061 - 2080 of 2,461
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am by INFORRM
Lord Faulks KC, chairman of the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO), told the BBC World at One that “most people don’t want anybody to know anything about their private life, but if they are prepared to discuss it then it is not unreasonable for the press to write about it. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 11:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  How we deal with the free rider being the TM owner—Packman v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:07 pm
Record high nitrate levels have been found in Des Moines' water -  6 times higher than federal limits. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm by opseo
How are these people going to pay an additional tax? [read post]
1 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Johnson (holding that banning homeless people from camping outside did not violate the Eighth Amendment even when they have nowhere else to go), and Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm by John Elwood
This case presented a vagueness challenge to the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act sentencing guideline, when a similar provision in the act itself had been invalidated in Johnson v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]