Search for: "People v. Finely"
Results 2061 - 2080
of 5,637
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2016, 1:49 pm
Jeff Flake and John Katich will make fine candidates in 2020! [read post]
[Sasha Volokh] How a state dentistry board hounded non-dentist teeth-whiteners out of North Carolina
28 Jan 2014, 10:01 am
Today, I’ll talk about the details of North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 9:43 am
In Matal v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:47 am
The 12th case in the collection, Xiang Jiahong v Dreamer Film Ltd. et al., was selected specifically to show the boundary of fair use regarding calligraphy works.The plaintiff, Xiang Jiahong (Mr Xiang), is a well-known calligrapher. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 9:23 am
” People v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 5:00 pm
Pelloni v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 9:35 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 7:13 am
Michael Capuano (D-Mass.) said he wants people to worry about a fine or prison sentence when they dare to speak ill of him. [read post]
7 May 2011, 8:15 am
According to People magazine, Springfield's blood alcohol content was measured at .10, over the .08 limit in California. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 7:35 am
This was reinforced by a Superior Court decision: State v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 1:21 am
The prevalent policy in the United States seems to be that it is fine to spy on the rest of the world as long as Americans are more secure. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 10:08 am
Stewart said the 5-4 opinion in Florence v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 12:55 pm
Enforced bliss.Until, once again, people start to notice that the emperor has no clothes. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:03 pm
(Cue a scowl here from the legions of Scalia lovers in the audience.)The case at the heart of the hilarity is FCC v. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 7:55 am
Fine. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 7:01 am
Supreme Court agreed to hear the case, which will be argued by Stanford Law School Professor Jeff Fisher, the man who, in about an hour from now, will argue the Supreme Court case of Exxon v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 11:29 am
Oregon and virtually every other state have "implied-consent" laws, under which people who obtain driver's licenses agree to submit to breath, blood and urine tests - refusal of which can cost them to lose their licenses or pay fines. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 12:15 am
In People v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 8:00 am
Supreme Court in AT&T v. [read post]
