Search for: "People v. Speed"
Results 2061 - 2080
of 2,275
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 5:11 am
People v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 12:23 am
With this change, we can hopefully avoid what NTSB Chairman Mark V. [read post]
26 May 2009, 9:50 pm
In today’s case, Michel v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 10:49 am
Silvers v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 11:40 am
And some of the smartest people I know are awful at chess. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
: Warner Bros v V G Santosh (Spicy IP) Where do we go? [read post]
7 May 2009, 3:45 am
The only argument with any real validity was that this would speed up the handling of estates. [read post]
3 May 2009, 2:19 pm
People v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 8:31 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 9:00 pm
As one of the consultants at the company where I interned put it: "They must like having people outside their own companies show interest in their work, when their own spouses may not even show such an interest. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 2:10 pm
If a Court finds that 2 or more people are responsible for a motor vehicle collision in British Columbia the Court must ‘apportion’ liability as between them. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 5:30 am
If you like speed, you're going to love this. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 12:22 pm
The summary (pages 323-342) is balanced, well-written and recommended reading for anyone interested in getting up to speed on the current policy issues. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 8:50 am
These agreements were extremely controversial, in part because many people did not believe that the Treasury Secretary has the legal right to waive the congressional marked provision of Section 382. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 3:46 pm
Years ago in the case of Whren v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 3:27 pm
In People v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 10:27 am
Alberstone v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
- Amsterdam Court of Appeal rules in favour of Hachette Filipacchi Press, publisher of Elle magazine, in trade name/trade mark infringement litigation brought by clothing company WE Netherlands (Class 46) Poland District Administrative Court in Warsaw: ALDO S and ALDI not similar (Class 46) South Africa More on the Springbok emblem (Afro-IP) Sweden Appeal Court rules on reproduction of album cover artwork in case against Åhléns (International… [read post]
