Search for: "People v. Waits"
Results 2061 - 2080
of 5,498
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2017, 12:48 pm
In this case of consolidated appeals, People v Thomas, No. 329448 and People v Gordon, No. 329449, the Michigan Court of Appeals affirms the case against Clifford Thomas but vacates Jasmine Gordon’s conviction and remands for a new trial due to the ineffective assistance of Gordon’s counsel. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 5:52 pm
The California Supreme Court addressed this issue in People v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 3:36 pm
The Ninth Circuit in Mendez v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 8:14 am
People v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 9:53 am
Qualcomm) and Southern (Apple v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:00 pm
Case in point: The recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in Usanovic v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 12:16 pm
From Commonwealth v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 4:09 pm
In 1998, the Canadian Supreme Court in Thomson Newspapers Co. v. [read post]
14 May 2017, 3:07 pm
"State v. [read post]
12 May 2017, 7:00 am
Some of those cases reached the Supreme Court in a case called Zubik v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 10:20 am
An employer that qualifies to get group health coverage through the SHOP doesn’t have to wait for an annual enrollment period; it can start offering SHOP insurance to your employees any time of year by completing the enrollment process by the applicable deadline prior to the first day of the month that the employer wants to start offering coverage through the SHOP. [read post]
10 May 2017, 9:29 am
” Title VII protects people even if they are so-called employees-at-will, meaning that they lack contractual tenure or other general protection against firing. [read post]
10 May 2017, 5:26 am
Consider Justice Antonin Scalia's words in dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am
Yesterday, thirteen judges of the Fourth Circuit sitting en banc heard argument in IRAP v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 5:45 pm
There was no willingness to wait a week for the Congressional Budget Office to “score” the bill and provide presumptively accurate predictions about the actual number of people who would lose their insurance coverage, and so on. [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:01 pm
Can’t wait to start campaigning with him. [read post]
3 May 2017, 3:58 pm
” People v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 8:15 am
Years later, that Supreme Court decision, Korematsu v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 12:18 pm
’People v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 9:27 am
The case is Maslenjak v. [read post]
