Search for: "Public Service Co. v. State" Results 2061 - 2080 of 5,844
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2016, 11:30 am by Sarah Tate Chambers
Photobucket sets privacy at the album level; a user can set it at public, private, or password protected. [read post]
15 Aug 2006, 9:20 pm
  If a jury was going to decide the case, it had to decide the whole thing.The third case, Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 1:25 pm
His opinion he stated was also supported by the finding that those files that were completely downloaded did match what their file names claimed that they were.He was asked about the concept of IP spoofing, which he testified was difficult to perform on the public internet and that he had no reason to believe that it took place in this case.After a brief break Dr. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 11:15 am by Eric Goldman
The case reached the Supreme Court as an “Agreement for Discipline by Consent” between the state bar counsel and Zachary Naert–basically, a settlement agreement. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:33 am by Ad Law Defense
Co., 179 F.3d 557, 559 (7th Cir. 1999) (finding Title III coverage of websites in dicta); Morgan v. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm by Florian Mueller
"On the importance of technical innovation relative to design, I like the following passage from the brief:"To state the obvious, the investment in research and development for information and communication technologies—currently estimated at $250 billion annually—extends well beyond design to include the hardware, software, and services that are incorporated into the technological products. [...] [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
SXH v Crown Prosecution Service, heard 19 July 2016. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
He is also the writer of the Tort Talk Blog and provides mediation services through Cummins Mediation.Dog BiteIn the case of Roegner v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:38 am
New York State Department of Civil Service, 872 N.Y.S.2d 578 (3rd Dept. 2009), brings the merits issue front and center, because in that case the 3rd Department followed the lead of the 4th Department in Martinez and held that the Civil Service Department had properly decided to recognize same-sex marriages lawfully contracted elsewhere in administering employee benefits programs for public employees in the state. [read post]