Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES "
Results 2061 - 2080
of 9,847
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2012, 6:05 am
Over at the Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr has video of a recent conference of privacy law scholars on the “mosaic theory” of Fourth Amendment searches, which was embraced by the two concurring opinions in United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 1:41 pm
ShareMore than 80 amicus briefs were filed in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 7:18 pm
Indictment U.S. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:08 pm
PSKS, Inc.) and, of course, campaign finance (Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 11:52 am
Because the United States government prosecuted Mr. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:30 am
It was joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito. [read post]
8 May 2014, 10:57 am
In the Court’s opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts (writing for the majority) drew an analogy to Great Northern Railway Co. v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 9:37 am
Unlike in Valentine, Doe was picked up outside the United States (and in the context of armed conflict). [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 2:51 pm
Roberts, until 2004, when it decided Crawford v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 4:21 am
A case involving the fatal shooting of a Mexican national by a United States Border Patrol Agent is back at the Supreme Court a second time as the Justices heard arguments this week in Hernandez v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 10:16 am
11-556 (decided June 24, 2013) (PDF), the United States Supreme Court decided a question left open in Burlington Industries, Inc. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 5:00 am
In SEC v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 12:56 pm
CustisCase number: 12-cv-01696 (United States District Court for the District of Oregon)Case filed: September 20, 2012Qualifying Judgment/Order: September 11, 2013 10/22/2013 01/20/2014 2013-89 SEC v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 3:30 pm
A. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 7:24 am
As evidence, he notes that the Court has released only four opinions thus far, and has still not issued an opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 9:29 am
In 1803, the United States Supreme Court held in Marbury v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 6:48 am
Morris and NLRB v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 8:54 am
United States, 430 U.S. 188, 193 (1977) (explaining that when "no single rationale explaining the result [of a case] enjoys the assent of five Justices, 'the holding of the Court may be viewed as that position taken by those Members who concurred in the judgments on the narrowest grounds'" (quoting Gregg v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:10 pm
In United States v. [read post]
