Search for: "Russell v State"
Results 2061 - 2080
of 2,847
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2012, 8:27 pm
” Traditional wisdom as to cases that go to trial can be found in Master Hurst’s comments in Designer Guild Ltd v Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd (t/a Washington DC) (No 2) [2003] EWHC 9024 (Costs): “There is an argument for saying that in any case which reached trial a success fee of 100% is easily justified because both sides presumably believed that they had an arguable and winnable case. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:41 am
According to the complaint in Johnson’s Village Pharmacy, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:21 am
(Note: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., represents the respondent.) [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
Kevin Russell previewed the case. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 9:18 am
Coon; Menolascino v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 9:13 pm
Human Rights Council finds much to criticize about U.S. rights record, including inadequate attention to rights of clean water and sanitation; State Department response to “universal periodic review”; “The President Can’t Increase Congress’s Power Simply by Signing a Treaty” [Ilya Shapiro, Cato, on Supreme Court case of U.S. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:46 am
” Kevin Russell recently previewed Wednesday’s argument in Coleman v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 10:44 am
The trial court recognized that the multi-step procedures articulated by the Tennessee Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 5:55 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:15 am
See, e.g., Russell v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 11:27 am
This is not an issue I wrote about, but it is worth reading Russell Beck's discussion on the Fair Competition Law blog of Specialized Technology Resources v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:13 am
Petitioners’ reply United States Steel Corp. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 6:21 am
United States, urging the Court to strike Arizona’s controversial immigration law. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
Supreme Court reverses $2.5 million Hinds County jury verdict; Ermea Russell named to Miss. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 2:51 pm
RESENDIZ-PONCE AND RUSSELL v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 4:30 am
Russell did not sign it at all. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:31 pm
Lane, 66 Ohio State Law Journal 177 (2005) The California Recall Punch Card Litigation: Why Bush v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
(United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:35 am
” Emphasizing the dispute over state-federal relations in Arizona v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
In the United States following the Revolutionary War, liberties were jealously guarded by the states. [read post]
