Search for: "SMITH v. STATE" Results 2061 - 2080 of 9,993
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment provides:No person [1] shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, [2] who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to… [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 1:34 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Bigelow, 66 N.Y.2d 417, 497 N.Y.S.2d 630, 488 N.E.2d 451 [declining to follow "good faith" test outlined in United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 2:41 pm by Amy Howe
”  That was the question from Washington attorney Paul Smith, arguing at the Court today on behalf of the five-member independent commission charged with drawing new state legislative maps for Arizona. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 1:02 pm by Erin Miller
In the “white primary” cases (Smith v. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 9:00 am by Kalvis Golde
The justices will then hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 3:13 pm by Kurt T. Koehler
On June 4 I was in Washington and took the oath to join the bar of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
This post is the first of four looking at the decision of Smith J in Lidl & another v Tesco & another [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch). [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 2:47 pm
Just because I'm 19, was fired for embezzlement, and am carrying a loaded Smith & Wesson .38, you have the audacity to order that as a condition of probation, I can't smoke weed four times a week? [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:53 pm by Patricia Salkin
  The other milestone was the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) of 1967, in which a DI test was adopted by administrative rule, upheld by a plurality in Smith v. [read post]