Search for: "STAND et al. v. STATE."
Results 2061 - 2080
of 2,184
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2008, 4:42 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has issued an interesting opinion inBoard of Educ of Ottawa Township High School District 140, et al., v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 1:57 am
"
State v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Record labels sue Baidu over providing links to file-sharing sites: (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360), (Copyfight), Merck’s Fosamax patent expires: Watson Pharmaceuticals to distribute authorized generic version, Teva and Barr also launch FDA approved generic versions: (SmartBrief), (Patent Circle), (In … [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 1:01 pm
Dudley v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 6:20 am
Teleflex Inc. et al. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 3:25 pm
Intl Brotherhood National Labor Relations Board 08a0058p.06 Al-Najar v. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
Strayhorn, et al., Cause Number GN402300, in which the Travis County District Court granted Southwestern Bell’s Motion to Retain on January 8th, thus keeping the case eligible to being pursued to conclusion. [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 1:08 pm
Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 7:04 am
The anitrust case (Pacific Bell Telephone, et al., v. linkLine Communications, et al., 07-512) is a test of the theory that a “prize squeeze” violates the Sherman Act. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP Spotlight)PharmaIndia: Trade mark assignment under scrutiny in a case of deceptive similarity - Doctor Morepen Limited v Yash Pharma Laboratories Limited: (Mondaq),Arrow v Merck - An early route to market for generics? [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 12:41 am
State Farm et al., 1:06cv1080 (S.D. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 10:53 am
Paul Guardian Insurance, et al , a 12-page opinion, Judge Kirsch writes:Dreaded, Inc. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 6:11 am
It would legitimate the process, and the usual pussies at The Toronto Star et al would say: See, it proves there's no threat to freedom of speech from the HRC shtick. [read post]
22 Dec 2007, 7:31 am
Consequently, with the exception of its ruling on the fee litigation issue, the district court's decision is AFFIRMED. 07a0491p.06 2007/12/18 Beattie, et al v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 10:16 am
State of Indiana (NFP) [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 4:45 pm
"Shelly Parker et al, v. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 9:03 am
" Marbury v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 12:57 pm
Georgia Department of Education, et al., 48 IDELR 279 (N.D.Ga.2007), the court dismissed the case brought against various state agencies within the State of Georgia by a parent attorney who had tried and failed to use the same tactics against the same state agencies twice before. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 10:30 am
Plumtree Software, Inc., et al. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 10:15 am
In the building’s bowels we found the file for Elana Glatt et al. v. [read post]
