Search for: "Scalia v. United States"
Results 2061 - 2080
of 4,639
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2013, 11:40 am
SCALIA: Well, that's lovely. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 3:11 am
It does not mention color or race, but it does talk about the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:59 am
United States (No. 11-182). [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 7:39 am
The Court has not requested the views of the United States in Christopher. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 3:44 pm
United States, which is cited as good authority in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:18 am
”) (emphasis added); United States v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 7:07 pm
United States. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 7:01 am
United States, a sentencing case from the Eleventh Circuit addressing whether under the federal Armed Career Criminal Act a prior state conviction for battery is in all cases a "violent felony," even when the state held that offense does not have as an element the use or threatened use of physical force.It's amazing how close they let members of the Supreme Court bar sit to the Justices. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 3:49 am
United States, holding that the “residual clause” of the Armed Career Criminal Act is unconstitutionally vague, and the prospect that the Court will weigh in on the question. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 2:32 pm
As Justice Scalia noted, the Court in United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 2:56 am
” At frESH, Danelle Gagliardi and Matthew Rojas analyze Monday’s decision in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 2:30 am
United States, a 1910 Supreme Court opinion respecting the then-U.S. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 11:00 pm
With the election of Barack Obama as the 44th President of the United States and with the Democrats gaining seats in the House and Senate, some changes in employment law, including wage and hour law, could be coming in the next four years. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 9:12 pm
In National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 6:59 am
United States, and now Harbison v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:00 am
So the United States Supreme Court says, Yes, there was IAC here. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 5:21 am
California and United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 7:13 am
Stanford student Daniel Matro discusses last Wednesday’s oral argument in Corley v. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 5:37 am
United States, U.S., No. 04-1034 (2006). [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 11:17 am
Dan Himmelfarb from the Solicitor General's Office argued on behalf of the United States. [read post]
