Search for: "Sharp v. State" Results 2061 - 2080 of 2,518
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2018, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
In an attempt to persuade Tory Rebels to vote against the Leveson 2 amendments, the government added an amendment 62BC which provides that the Secretary of State mandate a review of press regulators alternative dispute resolution procedures, Brian Cathcart considers this in an INFORRM post. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 5:50 am by Berke Gursoy
This is a high but not impossible bar to meet, as shown in United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 2:06 pm by Paul A. Prados
  "[T]he individual mandate is a sharp departure from all prior exercises of federal power. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:46 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Corp., 137 So. 2d 563, 564 (Fla. 1962) (sharp piece on playground equipment amputated three-year-old‘s finger); McCabe v. [read post]
6 May 2007, 7:30 pm
The big case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States this past week, at least for patent attorneys like the host of last week's Blawg Review #106, was KSR v Teleflex. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Robert McKay
Clear branding and sharp market focus do not seem to have been key features of late. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 8:49 am by Dave Maass
Second, the claims are ineligible for patent protection under the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Alice v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
Magliocca makes a good case for why such appeals to fixity were likely unavoidable in the United States. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:52 am by INFORRM
Evening Standard editor George Osborne has criticised the proposed Data Protection Bill stating that cost amendment provisions shifting Claimants’ legal costs to papers would be unduly onerous. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
: Kelly and another v GE Healthcare Ltd (IP finance) (Mis)appropriation of Wii and PlayStation brands to name medical disorders (IPKat) Is regulation of trade mark attorneys necessary? [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
The News Media Association has said there are “grounds for judicial review” of the decision to recognise Impress as a state-approved press regulator. [read post]