Search for: "Small v. State"
Results 2061 - 2080
of 15,239
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2023, 8:13 pm
In any case, Price v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 4:56 am
The law known as the “Little” Tucker Act authorizes federal district courts to entertain small dollar civil claims against the United States, “in cases not sounding in tort. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 8:22 am
But it is hoped that this compromise between authors, publishers, libraries, and a company willing to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to digitize so much of the printed history of humanity will be another small step toward the vision that the Alexandrian Library represents. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 3:51 am
In Goodyear Dunlap Tires Operations, S.A. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 7:42 pm
It's not small beer in the copyright world. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 4:24 am
” Carnegie v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 5:38 pm
See United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2024, 12:03 pm
This is a major ruling validating the legitimacy of competitive keyword advertising, which occurs when an advertiser purchases and displays ads triggered in response to third-party trademarks. [read post]
14 May 2008, 5:40 am
In State v. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 2:53 pm
The CLIA State Operations Manual (SOM) which provides interpretive guidance to investigators conducting laboratory surveys, states that an inspector should “[v]erify that the laboratory documents all complaints and problems reported to the laboratory, and that it has a mechanism to determine which complaints require investigation. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 10:07 am
The mistake is assuming, as the questioner did, that these must be “small” injuries of inconsequential impairment. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 11:53 am
Virginia WARRANT IN DEBT — SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION Note that the fields plaintiff must complete are shaded Warrant In Debt – Ron Friedmann v Shaw Industries, Inc. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:12 am
Notably, the Court of Appeal stated that subsequent case law, including Sage v Secretary of State for the Environment [2003] UKHL 22, has placed greater emphasis on the need to view planning permissions as a whole rather than as consent for delineable acts of development. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:46 am
That was what happened in the Florida Supreme Court’s State v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 4:47 pm
In Hudson v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 1:35 pm
Ultra Products, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 1:18 pm
This morning the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument in American Express Co. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 11:14 am
More importantly, the ruling in Jerman v. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 3:50 am
Supreme Court [in McGirt v. [read post]
