Search for: "Smith v. California"
Results 2061 - 2080
of 2,261
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2009, 4:21 pm
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and remanded to the district court to amend its written judgment were the judgment failed to include any reasons for the court’s upward departure from the guidelines range, agreeing with the Second Circuit in U.S. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 8:00 am
In Smith v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 6:48 am
Smith filed separate suits in 2005 in the U.S. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Winthrop Laboratories, 697 F.2d 222, 229 (8th Cir. 1983).California: Carlin v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 7:55 pm
Perhaps the most famous probate litigation case ever, Marshall v. [read post]
FTC and California AG Join in Challenging Reverse Payment Settlements in the Pharmaceutical Industry
6 Mar 2009, 7:03 am
Trade Comm'n et al. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
Eisenberg Koret Professor of Law Boalt Hall University of California at Berkeley Charles M. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 7:05 am
L'Oreal USA, Inc. (2006) 39 Cal. 4th 77, the California Supreme Court agreed. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 11:00 pm
Smith, (WI Ct. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 10:50 am
So here, the question is whether an Oregon attorney who assists a California lawyer in an ERISA action in the Central District of California can be awarded atttorney's fees even though he's not a California lawyer.As you might gather from the rhetoric employed by Judge Smith (which includes the line "Current law does not compel us to be judicial Luddites"), the majority opinion here holds that the Oregon lawyer can, in fact, recover fees. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 2:27 am
See Thomas v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(C.D.Cal. 2008) 2008 WL 4690536 Watson-Smith v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 6:27 am
Last week, the California Supreme Court issued an important new CLRA decision, Meyer v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 11:43 am
Gordon Smith, Glen L. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:42 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 7:47 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
As we reported yesterday, the California Supreme Court denied the petitions for review in Wyeth v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 1:34 am
In Schmerber v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 2:00 pm
The Los Angeles Times has this story about a pending California Supreme Court case, Martinez v. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 12:21 pm
Smith) joined the dissent. [read post]
