Search for: "Spells v. State"
Results 2061 - 2080
of 2,206
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2010, 12:15 am
The case involves a defense objection under Batson v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 11:42 am
., v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 1:50 am
V. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 9:30 pm
As an assistant to New York City’s then-Police Commissioner, Patrick V. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 10:25 pm
Also some famous Taiwanese trademark names such as Chunghwa Telecom and Taiwan Beer cannot be registered in China, because article 10 Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China prohibits that signs identical or similar to the state name (Chunghwa is Taiwanese spelling for Zhongguo, which means China) or a province (Taiwan is considered a province by China) as a trademark. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 5:19 am
While they served the needs of workers well in the early days, things had changed over the decades and the imbalance of power wasn't nearly as imbalanced as it was when Eugene V. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 7:54 am
“The problem is that the Constitution does not spell out in any unequivocal way what the division of authority is between the president and the Senate,” he elaborated. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 5:55 pm
That one way is spelled out, in very clear words, in Article V of ECUSA's Constitution, and it has not changed in over 200 years. [read post]
2 May 2017, 9:01 pm
Consider that the lawyer Trump hired to defend him against a charge that he incited violence against peaceful protesters at a campaign event cited Clinton v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 2:19 pm
., v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 5:11 am
Promissory estoppel: Barnes v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 11:47 am
Fine, then the majority decides who keeps the property -- no other result is possible, unless the articles or bylaws spell out some different requirement, which is highly unlikely.Are the parties in a "hierarchical" church? [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
As the present disclaimers have the purpose of restoring novelty over D4b, it is necessary in view of the criteria developed in decision G 1/03 for allowability of disclaimers introduced to restore novelty to determine whether D4b published between the priority date claimed and the filing date represents state of the art pursuant to A 54(3) or a disclosure pursuant to A 54(2). [6] In the context of assessing whether D4b is state of the art pursuant to A 54(3) or A 54(2), the… [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 6:37 am
Two state troopers got out and walked toward her. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 11:18 am
Response: UIPL 2-16 (1 Oct. 2015) states, in relevant part: A. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:56 am
Equity's concern with the protection of information can be seen as far back as 1818 and the canonical case of Gee v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 2:20 am
He stated [emphasis added]: “[27]. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
Richard Kopf Why CLS proves that Buck v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
In Marshall v. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:58 am
This is completely optional, but it is important to state clearly whether or not you will be using this approach. [read post]
