Search for: "State v. A. T. D."
Results 2061 - 2080
of 23,971
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2016, 7:49 am
Merit Decision On December 6, 2012, the Supreme Court handed down a merit decision in Doss v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 4:46 am
Back in June, in State v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
Edwards, Chief Judge, D .C. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm
State Bd. of Ed. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 8:59 am
(There wasn't any, but I thought I'd be thorough)Here, Karenev sent threatening and harassing e-mails to his wife during the pendency of their divorce. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
§ 15(d)(2)(B)(ii)(II), part of the 2022 amendments to the Electoral Count Act, states that “[t]he only grounds for objections shall be [if] ... [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 7:36 am
(But, I wonder, doesn’t that render “established by the State” superfluous?) [read post]
4 May 2011, 12:10 pm
The dissent thought this writer’s claim was closer to (b).The case is Montz v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 11:59 pm
We mere mortals won't know what the result of the conference is until next week, of course, but we thought we'd get you ready. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:33 pm
Rather, he wrote, “[t]he two precedents sit comfortably side by side. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 3:39 am
Bolton (which we’ll talk about on Thursday), and the other in State v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:34 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:15 am
” In Tuesday’s United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
(New York is one of the states that does not require service of the complaint with the summons, a point familiar to me from Murphy Bros. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 6:03 pm
Robert D. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:43 am
Supp. 2d 1207 (D. [read post]
11 May 2018, 7:32 am
Additional Resources: Saenz v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 7:26 am
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 564 F.3d 1256 (11th Cir. 2009), which “reasoned that (1) § 1332(d)(5)(B)’s jurisdictional limitation applies to ‘proposed’ classes; (2) ‘jurisdictional facts are assessed at the time of removal’; and (3) ‘post-removal events [(including non- or de-certification)] do not deprive federal courts of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 11:22 am
United States and Overton v. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 4:44 am
appeared first on Russell D. [read post]
