Search for: "State v. Argus "
Results 2061 - 2080
of 85,033
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2024, 7:44 am
The effect has been to stifle innovation and competition in the field of legal information and, I would argue, to impede justice and the rule of law. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
For instance, the 1993 California case Johnson v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
In Young v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am
United States The House of Representatives have passed the Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, a bill which has been characterised as having the power to ban TikTok. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
In SEC v. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 8:04 pm
In United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 7:17 pm
In 2018, three companies acknowledged that some of the programs endorsed by the NRA violated state law. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 7:59 am
Rather, they argued that the name and packaging conveyed that there is a connection, approval, or affiliation between "New Certan" and VCC. [read post]
The Supreme Court Cannot Ignore the National Security Implications of the So-Called ‘Jawboning’ Case
17 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
As the Court considers Murthy v Missouri—just as it should in considering the NetChoice “anti-censorship” cases argued last month—it must recognize not only the substantial national security and public safety harms from disinformation and extremist content on social media, but also the necessity for government officials to be able to communicate freely with social media companies about the abuses of their services by malign actors. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 9:31 pm
Sorting Fact From Fiction Murthy v Missouri started out as Missouri v Biden, a complaint filed with the US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana against President Joe Biden, several federal agencies, and government officials. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 4:04 pm
Quoting an article by Felix Frankfurter from 1916, and also citing Ernst Freund, Post states that Progressives had repudiated Lochner v. [read post]
US Supreme Court rules public officials can be sued for blocking users on social media in some cases
16 Mar 2024, 11:28 am
In one, Lindke v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 11:06 am
The Sixth Circuit recently reminded us of this in United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 7:50 am
Services v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:39 am
West v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:16 am
Furthermore, they argue that citizens and states have a First Amendment “right to receive information and ideas. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 1:01 am
In Fletcher v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 7:12 pm
In a case being heard Monday at the Supreme Court, 45 Washington lawmakers have argued that government communications with social media sites about possible election interference misinformation are illegal.Agencies can't even pass on information about websites state election officials have identified as disinformation, even if they don't request that any action be taken, they assert.Yet just this week the vast majority of those same lawmakers said the government's… [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 5:29 pm
In Chesanovska v. [read post]
