Search for: "State v. Case"
Results 2061 - 2080
of 193,613
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2024, 4:30 am
Here is the abstract: This short essay explains why two cases involving gun rights — United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 6:36 am
In the case of the day Po-Hi Tang v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 6:36 am
In the case of the day Po-Hi Tang v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 5:49 am
Tygart | Texas Federal Court Will Hear Lance Armstrong Case on August 10, Disputing, July 18, 2012 Armstrong v. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
On July 20, the Ninth Circuit declined to rehear en banc Fazaga v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:33 pm
United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 2:21 pm
On Monday, March 21, 2016, the United States Supreme Court accepted certiorari in Samsung Electronics v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 8:35 am
Doherty v Birmingham City Council (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening) [2008] UKHL 57; [2008] WLR (D) 291 “The definition of ‘protected site’ in s 5(1) of the Mobile Homes Act 1983, in excluding gipsies from the protection of the Act, was incompatible with an occupier's right under art 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms to respect for his home. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 1:11 pm
In a brief per-curium, or unsigned, order, the Court dismissed United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 4:46 am
State of Ohio v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 11:07 am
In the present cases, Petitioners the State of Wyoming and Park County, Wyoming filed petitions for review of agency action, challenging the 2009 rules governing snowmobile use in the parks. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:44 am
Not since R (Baiai) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53 (where foreign nationals were required to obtain the Secretary of State’s permission to get married) has there been such an obvious case of a disproportionate immigration measure. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:44 am
Not since R (Baiai) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53 (where foreign nationals were required to obtain the Secretary of State’s permission to get married) has there been such an obvious case of a disproportionate immigration measure. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
Importantly, after reading the various takes on United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 1:54 pm
City of Chicago (Gun Case) Debate March 15, 2010 Federalist Society In this podcast, you can see a debate about an issue that was argued before the United States Supreme Court just two weeks ago – McDonald v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 2:20 am
R (Child Poverty Action Group) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions 2010 UKSC 54; [2010] WLR (D) 322 ”The only right to recover overpaid social security benefits paid according to an award was that conferred by s 71 of the Social Security Administration Act 1992 which provided an exhaustive scheme for dealing with all overpayments made pursuant to benefit awards and applied only where there had been misrepresentation or non-disclosure. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 5:00 pm
California v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 10:09 am
State of Washington Dept. of Fish and Wildlife: shopbell-opinion We posted materials on this case here. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 6:23 am
Co. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 3:14 pm
Ragard v. [read post]
