Search for: "State v. Cooper"
Results 2061 - 2080
of 7,449
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2011, 12:12 am
He added that his abduction and rendition to France were also planned by the CIA and were not the result of a judicial cooperation between States. [read post]
1 May 2022, 8:36 pm
The Court stated in R. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 8:34 pm
Adhering states are to cooperate with their designated NCPs by finding them adequately. [read post]
12 Dec 2020, 11:20 am
” United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 8:18 pm
Affirming in United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 10:01 am
The case of Lasalle v. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 6:00 am
Cooper to Reconsider Takings Claim — David Newhoff writes a briskly paced recap of state sovereign immunity and the latest development involving the district court in Allen v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 3:51 pm
He actually tried a felon in possession case -- United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 5:02 am
Hyundai Motor America v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:16 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 6:16 pm
Osheroff v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 12:45 am
Thanks to my old colleague Frank for passing this to me:Some Excerpts from United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
By Dan Cooper & Maria-Martina Yalamova On June 6, 2014, the Justice and Home Affairs Council of the European Union (the “Council”), representing individual EU Member States, reached a common position on certain important aspects of the draft European Data Protection Regulation (the “Regulation”). [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 2:20 pm
” (Pierotti v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 10:49 am
U.S. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 3:51 am
Indeed, in State v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 9:22 am
The Personal Comfort Doctrine in Cooper v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 10:55 am
Misuse of powers since recourse was had to enhanced cooperation although the purpose is not to achieve integration of all the Member States - the mechanism having been used instead to avoid negotiating with a Member State, imposing upon it an opt-out solution - and although the objectives pursued in this instance could have been achieved by means of a special agreement as provided for in Article 142 of the European Patent Convention. [read post]
28 May 2010, 5:12 am
C.H. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 3:17 pm
From a decision today by Judge John Sinatra (W.D.N.Y.) in Christian v. [read post]
