Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I"
Results 2061 - 2080
of 4,097
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2014, 11:08 am
The defendant relies upon the case of State of Columbia v Heller. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:25 am
No appeal to the Constitutional Court shall be made with regard to these agreements, on the grounds that they are unconstitutional. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 12:59 pm
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 3:30 am
" This view was amplified by the Court of Appeals in a subsequent ruling, Watertown Education Association, 93 NY2d 132. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 11:19 am
But the DOJ Antitrust Division's amicus briefs in this context here are absurd, and that's why I'm glad the industry tells the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit what's truly in the interest of the U.S. economy.For the most part, the four briefs just reinforce the FTC's points and explain the importance of standard-setting and compliance with FRAND licensing commitments (including licenses to chipset makers) from… [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 11:12 am
In ruling on his appeal, the New Jersey Superior Court – Appellate Division (hereinafter, “Appellate Division”), noted that [t]he decision whether to dismiss an indictment lies within the discretion of the trial courts. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
The letter stated that petitioner would “be responsible for providing instruction to students assigned to [i]n-[s]chool [s]uspension. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
The letter stated that petitioner would “be responsible for providing instruction to students assigned to [i]n-[s]chool [s]uspension. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
The letter stated that petitioner would “be responsible for providing instruction to students assigned to [i]n-[s]chool [s]uspension. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
The letter stated that petitioner would “be responsible for providing instruction to students assigned to [i]n-[s]chool [s]uspension. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 4:44 am
I repeat, so far: it remains to be seen what happens in the years ahead should Microsoft and Motorola not settle before some appeals are resolved and some infringement assertions are finally taken to trial in the Western District of Washington.The impact of Apple and Microsoft's IP enforcement efforts was and is obviously not limited to the patents they successfully enforce in court. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:53 am
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.I'm back to the Second Amendment because of this comment, because I find my own views on the Second Amendment so at odds with how I see the world, and because, frankly, I haven't figured out just what I want to say about Judge Bolton's order in United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 2:28 pm
Roberts, in his opinion for the court in the 2019 gerrymandering case Rucho v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 3:00 am
Justice Fisher draws a sharp distinction between rulings by New York's highest court in Sterling Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 6:31 am
The Court of Appeals of Washington examined this issue in State v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 4:29 am
The claimant sued for damages before the High Court of Justice, Queens Bench Division. [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 7:09 am
Friedman LLC represents defendants who seek to appeal convictions from the New Jersey State trial courts to the New Jersey Appellate Division, and from the United States District Court in New Jersey to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 7:52 am
MetLife appealed to the Arkansas Appellate Court, Division 3, and the question became whether transfer of Claimant’s structured settlement payment rights contravenes 33 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 5:47 am
Case in point, just this week it became known that one of the two patent-specialized divisions of the Dusseldorf Higher Regional Court (regional appeals court), under Presiding Judge Ulrike Voss ("Voß" in German), faithfully applied the Sisvel v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:51 am
See Barone v. [read post]
