Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I"
Results 2061 - 2080
of 4,097
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2015, 2:08 pm
When a party seeks a writ from the Court of Appeals to interfere with an ongoing case in the trial court, the writ is typically styled "[Litigant] v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 12:18 am
There has been a request for leave to appeal in the High Court case due to be heard soon. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 4:29 am
An Appeals Panel agreed and Seabright sought judicial review; a Starr County District Court Judge granted summary judgment in favor of Maximina, and the 4th DCA upheld that decision last year.Seabright then asked the Texas Supreme Court to review - all the while, I presume, holding on to the death benefit money.Seabrights novel argument is that since the Supreme Court's 2010 decision in Leordeanu v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 3:19 am
I wrote extensively about the lower court’s fair value determination in Chiu in a two-part post (here and here), so I won’t rehash the full, convoluted story. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 6:50 pm
The Court of Appeals unanimously held, contrary to the finding of the Appellate Division, that the language of the will did not show such a clear intention. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 6:00 am
The appeals court also rebuffed the mother’s argument that the father’s relocation outside the United States was, by itself, a sufficient change of circumstances. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 1:00 pm
The court subsequently certified a class, and defendant appealed. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 10:04 am
App. 108 Appeal from the Pulaski County Circuit Court, Twelfth Division, The Honorable Alice S. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 4:00 pm
As the Supreme Court noted in Arizona v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 2:23 pm
Rule 14a-8(i)(7) Ordinary Business Operations The first, Rule 14a-8(i)(7), comes in the context of the recent Delaware District Court decision in Trinity Wall Street v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 2:23 pm
Rule 14a-8(i)(7) Ordinary Business Operations The first, Rule 14a-8(i)(7), comes in the context of the recent Delaware District Court decision in Trinity Wall Street v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 2:23 pm
Rule 14a-8(i)(7) Ordinary Business Operations The first, Rule 14a-8(i)(7), comes in the context of the recent Delaware District Court decision in Trinity Wall Street v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 11:12 am
In fact, until this year, it’s possible you could count the number on one finger, that being the Court of Appeals’ 2008 ruling in the Appleton Acquisition case which I wrote about here. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 9:34 am
On February 25, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of SRMOF 2009-1 Trust v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 7:16 am
Its Senior VP of sales believed he could triple sales in the Commercial & Industrial Division (C&I) and designed a bonus plan. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 6:19 am
" Padgett has a lot of names, officially it isFlorida Workers Advocates v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 8:22 pm
Queens Probate Attorneys in Azzara v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 3:21 am
George Vozary et al CASE NO. 1:14 CV 469 US District Court Northern District of Ohio Eastern Division. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 4:25 am
I frankly am surprised this issue hasn't been decided yet: Whether a foreign truck driver working for a foreign trucking firm who gets injured while driving a foreign truck on United States territory can be the subject of a state workers' compensation scheme if the driver had already availed himself of the foreign system.But, apparently that issue has never been addressed - at least not by the United States Supreme Court.SCOTUS docketed for review… [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 9:57 am
Innovative Contracting Solutions, Inc., a recent decision from the Atlanta Division of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. [read post]
