Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 2061 - 2080
of 3,609
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 3:36 am
The recent House of Lords decision in R v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 8:00 am
The working group will also hear a presentation comparing the privacy risks of legacy v. non-legacy systems. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 6:52 pm
Furthermore, Lord Browne-Wilkinson in Pepper v Hart said that Article IX was ‘a provision of the highest constitutional importance’ which ‘should not be narrowly construed’. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 1:09 am
Applying the House of Lords decision in Lesotho Highlands Development Authority v Impregilo SpA [2005] UKHL 43, Tomlinson J held that an error of law does not involve an excess of power under section 68(2)(b) of the Act. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 8:38 pm
Chandler v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 10:00 pm
Surprisingly this nettle has only really been grasped once before, by the House of Lords seven years ago in R (Mullen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, where the question whether the abuse of process in getting the defendant deported from Zimbabwe to trial in the UK rendered his conviction so unsafe as to qualify him for compensation for miscarriage of justice. [read post]
7 May 2012, 3:05 am
. : Continuing Professional Development, Law Society of Upper Canada, 2012 1 v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD, heard 13 May 2014. [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:00 pm
Famous examples are R v Director of Public Prosecutions, Ex p Kebilene [2000] 2 AC 326 , R (L) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2010] 1 AC 410 and Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] UKHL 30. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:10 pm
Marzen East Carolina University and Florida State University, SSRN. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 1:20 pm
The court on December 4 will hear the following cases (with the issue presented as stated on the court’s website): Bourhis v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:44 am
R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD, heard 13 May 2014. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 1:58 am
R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD, heard 13 May 2014. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
This reluctance has been captured by an admonition credited to Lord Denning about the importance of a judge not conducting the examination of witnesses because “he, so to speak, descends into the arena and is liable to have his vision clouded by the dust of conflict …” (Lord Denning was quoting Lord Greene MR, in Yuill v Yuill [1945] P 15, 20.) [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 6:09 am
Regardless whether a particular jurisdiction is a "notice/prejudice" state, see Prince Georges Cty. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 6:09 am
Regardless whether a particular jurisdiction is a "notice/prejudice" state, see Prince Georges Cty. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 12:37 am
The defendants were convicted on a majority verdict of 10 to 2; their appeal went all the way to the House of Lords and was dismissed: Whitehouse v Lemon and Gay News Ltd [1979] AC 617. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 7:16 am
Distinguishing the House of Lords decision in Denny-Mott and Dixon v James Fraser and Co [1944] A.C. 265, the judge held that the contract between the Club and IRISL was to provide indemnity insurance and that “[p]art of that purpose remained lawful. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 4:53 am
Article 57 states that an invention is susceptible of industrial application if it can be made or used in any kind of industry. [read post]
