Search for: "State v. Maker" Results 2061 - 2080 of 4,683
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2019, 2:13 pm
Rosie Burbidge reports on the Invista v Botes saga. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The seminal case in New York State regarding standards of fairness is the Pell decision [Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222]. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 8:00 am by Mark Graber
 State equality in the Senate constrains persons who believe in representation by population, configures politics by enabling low population states to receive far more than their fair share of federal funds, and constitutes politics when people assume that equal state representation is a natural feature of governance in the United States. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 8:10 am by Eric Goldman
Normally, a proposal like this get rubber-stamped through a state bar’s review process, so its approval seemed inevitable. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 7:30 pm
 [3] http://techlaw.justia.com/2012/05/04/zynga-files-trademark-suit-v-french-game-maker-over-ville/[4] http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp? [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:36 am
Short of shielding the decision maker from information, “consider the opposite” strategies show promise.[6]It is, however, important that the decision maker comes up with his or her own reasons why the opposite may have happened. [read post]
12 May 2012, 5:15 am by NL
Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 A.C. 167 and Pinnock adopted. [read post]
12 May 2012, 5:15 am by NL
Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 A.C. 167 and Pinnock adopted. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:30 pm by Victoria VanBuren
Gaitis With the issuance of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Rent-a-Center, West, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 3:29 pm
This was not, unlike the subject of a judicial review, a decision for which the decision maker was obliged to give reasons. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 9:21 am by Florian Mueller
" (emphasis added)Hey, that's the same Apple that has been telling state legislatures in Arizona and many other states that they shouldn't legislate on mobile app stores (and I guess Apple is not exactly a fan of right-to-repair state laws either). [read post]