Search for: "State v. Peoples"
Results 2061 - 2080
of 44,991
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2011, 2:21 pm
In United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 8:15 pm
See People v. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 9:21 am
See Banks v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 10:02 am
Nor can coercion be inferred from President Biden’s comment that social media companies are “killing people. [read post]
13 May 2015, 6:30 am
Recent United States Supreme Court decisions, such as Shelley v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 7:16 pm
On 12/15/09 in People v Wrotten (a name that works), the Court of Appeals, relying on People v Cintron (75 NY2d 249 [1990]) held that permitting an adult complainant living in another state to testify via real-time, two-way video after finding that because of age and poor health he was unable to travel to New York to attend court was within the trial court's inherent powers under Judiciary Law § 2-b, absent any specific statutory authority for… [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 2:17 am
The dust is starting to settle in the widely publicised case of Bragg v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 4:04 pm
The female driver, Valantein V. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 6:31 am
The answer that people gave was that as long as limits on association were symmetrical between the races, they were constitutional.We can see this logic at work in Pace v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
In Arsenault v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 11:00 am
The Court held that this wasn't a removable offense, and in so holding, modified somewhat (or applied in a particular setting) the "categorical approach" to determining whether a particular offense was an aggravated felony.The United States wasn't psyched about this rule, since it made deporting people a bit more difficult. [read post]
18 Apr 2025, 6:56 am
Central to FCC v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 10:50 am
The State has filed the final brief in the "ceded lands" case, Hawaii v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 1:59 pm
The case of People v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:39 am
By a rare 9-0 vote, in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:30 pm
A recent story out of the Boston area has caused quite a bit of a stir in the Bay State this week. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 10:48 am
At Monday's oral argument in Nijhawan v. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 10:22 am
[JURIST] The Supreme Court of Montana [official website] on Friday ruled [decision, PDF] that its state's November ballots may include Initiative 166 [text, PDF], a nonbinding policy statement that would direct the state's congress to support an amendment to the US Constitution [text] asserting that corporations are not people and money does not qualify as speech. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 2:00 pm
As we had hoped, the United States Supreme Court agreed today to review the First Circuit's remarkable ruling in Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
