Search for: "State v. Phillips" Results 2061 - 2080 of 2,874
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2023, 4:39 am by Rick Garnett
The assertedly reformative, rehabilitative effects of vigorous enforcement have also been invoked by Jack Phillips’s current opponents, who have as a stated aim “correct[ing] the errors of his thinking. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am by James Romoser
And Niina Farah of E&E News considers the implications for oil and gas development in the state. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed at USA Today, Jack Phillips, the cake artist at the center of last term’s Masterpiece Cakeshop case, explains that he is suing the Colorado state officials who are “attempting to punish me for declining to create a different custom cake — one that the customer admits was intended to express a message contrary to my faith. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 3:29 pm by Josh Blackman
Would Jack Phillips have lost on free speech grounds? [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 6:50 pm by Anthony Gaughan
Both King Phillip II of Spain, the most powerful ruler in Europe, and Pope Pius V, head of the Catholic Church, actively worked to overthrow Elizabeth and replace her with a Catholic monarch. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Arbitrator’s award baring disciplining an employee charged with sexual harassment while the employee was on “union leave” vacated as violative of public policy Matter of Phillips v Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Again, we see most state and territory governments with Labor governments. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:15 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
In last week’s judgment in Assange v The Swedish Prosecution Authority [2012] UKSC 22, the Supreme Court decided that the words ‘judicial authority’ in s 2(2) of the Extradition Act 2003 include prosecutors as well as courts. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:44 am by John Elwood
  Finally, the Court appears to be holding Phillips v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:48 am by charonqc
R (Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor [2010] UKSC 29 JUDGMENT The Supreme Court allowed the appeal on the jurisdiction issue (Lady Hale, Lord Mance and Lord Kerr dissenting) and unanimously dismissed the appeal on the inquest issue. [read post]