Search for: "Trust Entities 1-2"
Results 2061 - 2080
of 2,906
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2012, 4:06 pm
Possibilities: (1) bar any claim of confusion based on copyrighted works (strong form of channeling); (2) bar any claim of confusion arising out of content. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 3:11 am
Isn't the 2-party system a flawed model? [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 2:44 am
The plot further thickened when on 1 August 2012, Sello Hatang, again on behalf of the Nelson Mandela Foundation, stated: Hand: 46664 Foundation ... [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 2:44 am
The plot further thickened when on 1 August 2012, Sello Hatang, again on behalf of the Nelson Mandela Foundation, stated: Hand: 46664 Foundation ... [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 2:44 am
The plot further thickened when on 1 August 2012, Sello Hatang, again on behalf of the Nelson Mandela Foundation, stated: Hand: 46664 Foundation ... [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 9:57 am
Cal.Rptr.3d , 2012 WL 3089826, *1-*2 [Footnotes omitted]. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 8:29 am
News, Dec. 1, 2011, at 1. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 9:52 am
This opinion discusses issues of (1) judicial notice, (2) MERS’ ability to foreclose, and (3) the pleading of a violation of Section 2923.5. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 1:01 pm
However, the Administration would not support amendments that would weaken the critical infrastructure protection measures in the legislation, including: (1) reducing the Federal Government's existing roles and responsibilities in coordinating and endorsing the outcome-based cybersecurity practices; (2) weakening the statutory authorities of the Department of Homeland Security to accomplish its critical infrastructure protection mission; or (3) substantially expanding the… [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:17 pm
However, the Administration would not support amendments that would weaken the critical infrastructure protection measures in the legislation, including: (1) reducing the Federal Government’s existing roles and responsibilities in coordinating and endorsing the outcome-based cybersecurity practices; (2) weakening the statutory authorities of the Department of Homeland Security to accomplish its critical infrastructure protection mission; or (3) substantially expanding… [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 9:00 am
Please: 1.Drive safely. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:01 am
These testimonial blunders are indicative of a machine which has not been tested and was thrown into courts with an arrogant assumption that the judges and prosecutors will “trust” an unknown entity with an incredible financial incentive. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 10:43 pm
The fact of the matter is that beginning on January 1, 2013, foreclosing in California will be far more problematic for servicers than has been the case to-date. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 8:37 am
Channel 1 – Thorpe Insulation Addresses Insurer Standing to Object to Plan and Assignability of Insurance Contracts to Plan Trusts Bottom Line: Our first case discusses whether provisions of a chapter 11 plan were “insurance neutral” and, as such, whether insurers had the right to be heard in contesting the asbestos-liability channeling injunction of the plan. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 1:56 pm
The local government entity would go to court and argue that public purpose is served by having the county own and refinance the mortgage. 2. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:53 pm
And this, despite the fact that, historically, health services research has received only about 1% of the budget of NIH, the largest funder of basic biomedical research. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 4:49 pm
The report's two main concerns are: (1) the urgent need for guidance on de-identification methods, and (2) lack of a long-term plan for auditing covered entities and business associates for compliance with federal privacy and security rules (specifically, HIPAA and HITECH). [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 8:22 am
When the Medicare Trust Fund makes a conditional payment and the primary payer does not reimburse it, the United States may bring suit pursuant to §1395y(b)(2)(B)(iii). [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:00 am
Like most states, Massachusetts permits lawyers to use cloud based products so long as (1) lawyers make reasonable efforts to ensure that the vendor selected operates in a manner consistent with a lawyer’s professional obligations and (2) obtain clients’ express consent to use cloud products. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 11:34 am
Section 20.2031-1(b) (2012). [read post]
