Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant" Results 2061 - 2080 of 9,110
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2020, 12:58 pm by Peter Margulies
They may choose lower levels of immigration to preserve this attribute. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:30 pm by Christian Schröder
The level of surveillance is generally deemed to be higher if a company in the recipient country would be obliged to grant national intelligence agencies access to the data without an accompanying procedure granting sufficient legal protection. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:24 pm by G. Blane Clark
Highlights Borrowers must use a 24-week covered period for loan forgiveness purposes, unless they received loan proceeds before June 5, in which case they may elect to use the 8-week covered period. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 10:07 am by Christian Schröder
Whether or not a third country itself provides an adequate level of data protection itself is irrelevant. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Connecticut’s property tax burdens are rising rapidly, with the state’s effective property tax rates on owner-occupied housing now among the highest in the country at 1.7 percent of housing value. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 8:06 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The matter was then appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada, which released a decision in Reference re Genetic Non‑Discrimination Act this week granting the appeal, in a split 3-2-4 decision. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 4:02 am by Administrator
” Leaves to Appeal Granted Religious Institutions: MembershipEthiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church of Canada v. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 7:35 am
Royal, 875 F.3d at 907 n.5 (collecting state cases); see also US v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:55 am by Tessa Shepperson
Welsh landlords cannot serve possession notices if unlicensed This is the case of Jarvis v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:55 am by Tessa Shepperson
Welsh landlords cannot serve possession notices if unlicensed This is the case of Jarvis v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 5:48 pm
  The Court of Appeal reverses the trial court and holds that Santa Monica isn't required to move from at-large voting for council members to district-level voting. [read post]