Search for: "United States v. Brown" Results 2061 - 2080 of 4,557
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2014, 8:37 am by Kent Scheidegger
  The opinion begins (emphasis added):When a state prisoner seeks federal habeas relief on the ground that a state court, in adjudicating a claim on the merits, misapplied federal law, a federal court may grant relief only if the state court's decision was "contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 12:47 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Dorsey & Whitney, 88 F.3d 536 (8th Cir. 1996) — 88_f.3d_536 United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm
 Louisiana Law     Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:22-CV-1114. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 5:00 am by Chris
While at WilmerHale he was the lead counsel representing the University of Michigan and its then president Lee Bollinger before the United States Supreme Court in the famous Gratz v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 8:30 am by Kali Borkoski
United States Law Offices of Mitchell N. [read post]
29 May 2014, 7:01 pm
But if we are looking for huge sales in the United States market for a handgun typically holding more than 10 rounds, that did not come until 1935, with the 13-round Browning Hi-Power. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 2:47 pm by John Elwood
Brown, 11-391, and Clarksburg Nursing Home v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 4:50 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2014) (citing Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 9:00 pm by Shannon O'Hare
At the federal level, United States trademark law is governed by the Trademark Act of 1946, or the Lanham Act, which provides for, among other [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 6:41 am by Brian Shiffrin
As study after study has showed, residence, especially in urban centers, can be the most accurate predictor of race” (United States v Bishop, 959 F2d 820, 827-828 [9th Cir 1992]).Subsequently, however, in Boyde v Brown, (404 F3d 1159, 1171 [9th Cir 2005]) either sharply limited or overruled this holding:It may be unpersuasive for a prosecutor to use residence without attempting to tie it to the facts of the case. [read post]