Search for: "United States v. Cores" Results 2061 - 2080 of 3,430
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2015, 12:37 pm
  The essay is also important for an important judiciary noticeable by its absence--that of the United States. [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 5:31 am by Elizabeth Goitein
Title 10 Chapter 15 also prohibits the provision of support to civilian law enforcement agencies “if the provision of such support will adversely affect the military preparedness of the United States” (10 U.S.C. [read post]
Both guidelines state that it is good practice to conduct a DPIA in most cases, as it allows employers to determine if and how to carry out monitoring in a way that minimizes the risks of any monitoring activity. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
But officials broke "[v]irtually every promise" they made. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 11:53 am
The last several centuries, however, have seen liberal democratic systems move toward a more hybrid position Like Marxist-Leninist systems, liberal-democratic ideologies have embraced the core premise that neither the individual nor society may be left to their own devices. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 2:02 am by Ben
These have argued to not substantially be the base of the challenge as a small standard selection and arrangement gets a fairly thin copyright protection due to the “creative” standard of Originality being prevalent in the United States. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 5:09 am by Scott Bomboy
Oldham wrote in September 2022 that social media companies do not have a right to “muzzle” free speech and act more like common carriers that are “central public forums for public debate and have enjoyed governmental support in the United States. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm by Amy Howe
  Environmental concerns also are at the core of the third case, Pacific Merchant Shipping Association v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 3:38 am by SHG
Trump came up with an idea about excluding Muslims from entry into the United States. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 5:36 am by Matthew Flinn
In Edwards v United Kinghdom (2002) 35 EHRR 19, it said only that: …there must be a sufficient element of public scrutiny of the investigation or its results to secure accountability in practice as well as in theory. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 8:45 am by Lyle Denniston
  Justice Thomas had dissented in January when the Court, in another election case (Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by Michael Litchfield
Indeed, the Supreme Court of Canada recently delivered its decision in Alberta (Information and Privacy Commissioner) v United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 401 that found the Alberta Personal Information Protection Act to be constitutionally invalid. [read post]